RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-07 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Saturday, December 03, 2011 9:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Jonas, Since you believe we should keep the values of version as a non-nullable long long, what should the value of version be during the first

Re: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-07 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: On Saturday, December 03, 2011 9:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Jonas, Since you believe we should keep the values of version as a

RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-07 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: On Saturday, December 03, 2011 9:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Jonas,

Re: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-07 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: On Saturday, December 03, 2011 9:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Dec 1,

RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-07 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 3:45 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: On Saturday,

Re: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-03 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Jonas, Since you believe we should keep the values of version as a non-nullable long long, what should the value of version be during the first run/creation if the transaction is aborted? Should it be 0 (I don't

[indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

2011-12-01 Thread Israel Hilerio
Jonas, Since you believe we should keep the values of version as a non-nullable long long, what should the value of version be during the first run/creation if the transaction is aborted? Should it be 0 (I don't believe we want version to be a negative number)? Israel