On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Yup. Though I think WebIDL will take care of the handling for when the
author specifies a negative value. I.e. WebIDL will specify what
exception to throw, so we don't need to. Similar to how WebIDL
specifies what exception
Since advance is intended to always move the cursor forward, it seems we want
to only support positive parameter values. Therefore, I would suggest we
change its signature to:
void advance (in unsigned int count);
If a developer specifies a negative number for it, we could throw an
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Since advance is intended to always move the cursor forward, it seems we want
to only support positive parameter values. Therefore, I would suggest we
change its signature to:
void advance (in unsigned int count);
