2009/11/30 Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com:
widget.getItem(name) Revolutionary? Well, if you're in business selling
keyboards and RSI relief, maybe.
I thought it might save on DOM pollution. I have been playing with a debugger
and the global vars passed between the Web runtime and debugger are
On Nov 25, 2009, at 15:52 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
If the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-apis/#the-preferences-attribute was
mandatory, which I think it should be since many widgets I've come across
rely
on **setPreferenceForKey** and **preferenceForKey** conventions, wouldn't it
be
sensible
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Kai Hendry hen...@aplix.co.jp wrote:
http://git.webconverger.org/?p=faq;a=commit;h=1f335b2997aedb034ca92d06bf815c623939179e
Please forgive the informal prose.
Yeah, like we are soo serious here! :P If it makes you feel
better, I'm responding to your email
Some comments:
http://dabase.com/blog/Widget_mapping_quirks/
Do I need to send them inline? I do prefer the Web since I can keep it
better upto date.
Kind regards,
On Nov 19, 2009, at 14:37 , Kai Hendry wrote:
Some comments:
http://dabase.com/blog/Widget_mapping_quirks/
Do I need to send them inline? I do prefer the Web since I can keep it
better upto date.
Right, but the problem is that you can change them after we've formally
addressed them, which
Hi all,
Widget interface spec ready for publication (Last Call) [1]. Will be out
sometime today (if not already published).
And test suite files are now online [2].
Enjoy in moderation!
Kind regards,
Marcos
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/
[2]
