Hi Andrey,
I'll try to look into this this week. We've also updated the test suite
to address the issues you outlined in your previous email. I've also
updated the spec so the that vendors can define their own transform
(instead of forcing 1.1).
On 2/2/11 7:34 AM, Andrey Nazarov wrote:
Hi Marcos,
On Jan/31/2011 2:18 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 1/31/11 7:52 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Andrey - on January 26, Marcos proposed changing the c14n algorithm in
[1] and [2] and notified the group in [3] that he updated the Editor's
Draft [ED] to reflect his proposal. He included
On 2/1/11 1:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Marcos,
On Jan/31/2011 2:18 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 1/31/11 7:52 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Andrey - on January 26, Marcos proposed changing the c14n algorithm in
[1] and [2] and notified the group in [3] that he updated the Editor's
Thank you,
I have one more question:
Test 19dsa.wgt.
The deal is when I look on the certificate that is used for this test I see that
it contains information about DSA Public Key, but the Signature Algorithm for
this certificate is pointed as SHA1withRSA. Is it correct?
I am not familiar with
://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/
[CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-widgets-digsig-20100624/#conformance
Original Message
Subject: Questions regarding to Test Suite for the XML Digital
Signatures For Widgets Specification
Resent-Date:Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:11:37 +
://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/
[CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-widgets-digsig-20100624/#conformance
Original Message
Subject:Questions regarding to Test Suite for the XML Digital
Signatures For Widgets Specification
Resent-Date:Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:11:37 +
On 1/31/11 8:18 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 1/31/11 7:52 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Andrey - on January 26, Marcos proposed changing the c14n algorithm in
[1] and [2] and notified the group in [3] that he updated the Editor's
Draft [ED] to reflect his proposal. He included rationale in [1].
