:22
To: Hillebrand, Rainer
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
Hi Rainer,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Hillebrand, Rainer
rainer.hillebr...@t-mobile.net wrote:
Dear Marcos,
The current version W3C Working Draft 11 March 2009 does
Hi Rainer,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Hillebrand, Rainer
rainer.hillebr...@t-mobile.net wrote:
Dear Marcos,
The current version W3C Working Draft 11 March 2009 does not mention the
gallery in Chapter 6.9: A screenshot is an optional file inside the widget
resource that graphically
Dear Marcos,
IMO, it is a good idea to support multiple screenshots that are used to
represent a widget in a running state. So, I support your proposal. The PC
might not be the right place to define running state. Under the assumption
that a widget could be in different running states multiple
Hi Rainier,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Hillebrand, Rainer
rainer.hillebr...@t-mobile.net wrote:
Dear Marcos,
IMO, it is a good idea to support multiple screenshots that are used to
represent a widget in a running state. So, I support your proposal. The PC
might not be the right place
Dear Marcos,
The current version W3C Working Draft 11 March 2009 does not mention the
gallery in Chapter 6.9: A screenshot is an optional file inside the widget
resource that graphically represents the widget in a running state. Well, the
question is what is a running state and which kind of
Marcos - I prefer your 2nd proposal. Unless contrary views are
expressed in the next few days, I recommend adding your proposal to
the ED.
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi,
I've decided that having the screenshots at the root of the widget
To: marc...@opera.com marc...@opera.com
Cc: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
Resent-From: public-webapps@w3.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:13:33 +
Marcos - I prefer your 2nd proposal. Unless contrary views
On 3/13/09 12:12 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Marcos - I prefer your 2nd proposal. Unless contrary views are expressed
in the next few days, I recommend adding your proposal to the ED.
Ok, tentatively added it but have not checked it in.
Kind regards,
Marcos
Might be good if we allow multiple screenshots in a widget. One
screenshot is just not enough to show off all aspects of a widget that
would motivate someone to download a widget. The file naming
convention would be identical to the Widgets Signatures file naming
convention:
thumbnail.jpg
