On Nov/6/2010 6:09 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[...] suggested the spec be published as a Working Group Note and this
is Call for Consensus to do.
I support this in principle.
OK.
I can't commit to providing the draft,
though. A few months ago I
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Are there any normative edits/changes that must be made to the doc
before it is published as a WG note?
I'm not aware of any.
Regarding the non-normative W3C boilerplate (e.g. Status of the
Document), Mike Smith indicated he is willing to work
I am glad to see this after having brought this up last year at TPAC. I support
this.
Nikunj
On Nov 6, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[...] suggested the spec be published as a Working Group Note and this
is Call for Consensus to do.
I
I support this too.
/ Jonas
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
I am glad to see this after having brought this up last year at TPAC. I
support this.
Nikunj
On Nov 6, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
During WebApps's November 1 gathering, participants discussed the Web
SQL Database spec:
http://www.w3.org/2010/11/01-webapps-minutes.html#item09
As we know, this spec is at an impasse as noted in the Status section:
[[
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/#status-of-this-document
This
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[...] suggested the spec be published as a Working Group Note and this
is Call for Consensus to do.
I support this in principle. I can't commit to providing the draft,
though. A few months ago I turned off this particular spigot in my
publishing
