On 15/08/2015 22:24, Phillips, Addison wrote:
This appears to make visual selection appealing--although it doesn't, for the
reasons mentioned elsewhere, lead to sensible text operations unless the
selected run happens to be all in a single direction.
and if the text runs all in a single
This appears to make visual selection appealing--although it doesn't, for
the
reasons mentioned elsewhere, lead to sensible text operations unless the
selected run happens to be all in a single direction.
and if the text runs all in a single direction, there's no difference between
what's the use case driving this, and where are the requirements
coming from?
i ask because i'm inclined to think that the circumstances in which
this would a produce useful results, given the way it carves up the
actual content, are quite, perhaps extremely, limited.
Well, the web
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Richard Ishida ish...@w3.org wrote:
my question was specifically, why do it in a non-standard way for bidi text?
(typical scenario is split visual but one range internally)
Which is not great for users, right? Also, as Addison points out, it's
unclear how that
We worked on this some years ago, and found that the cut/copy/paste were
very, very complicated to get to be natural, and ended up dropping it.
The problem is that if ...ABC... are adjacent ranges on the screen in the
source (each letter is a range), people expect to see ...ABC... when it is
On 15/08/2015 06:19, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
We've been recently exploring ways to select bidirectional text and content
that uses new CSS layout modes such as flex box in visually contagious manner.
Because visually
Hi Anne,
Not sure if this would answer your question, but in general, when it comes to
BiDi you need to differentiate between the physical order (what is in memory,
e.g, ABC) and the logical order (what the user expects to see (e.g., CBA). At
the same time to handle copy/paste, you will be
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Richard Ishida ish...@w3.org wrote:
what's the use case driving this, and where are the requirements coming
from?
i ask because i'm inclined to think that the circumstances in
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Richard Ishida ish...@w3.org wrote:
what's the use case driving this, and where are the requirements coming
from?
i ask because i'm inclined to think that the circumstances in which this
would a produce useful results, given the way it carves up the actual
Cc: public-webapps; Ehsan Akhgari; Aryeh Gregor; public-editing-tf;
www-internatio...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Copying multi-range selection
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
We've been recently exploring ways to select bidirectional text and content
that uses
Hi all,
We've been recently exploring ways to select bidirectional text and content
that uses new CSS layout modes such as flex box in visually contagious manner.
Because visually contagious range of content may not be contagious in DOM
order, doing so involves creating a disjoint multi-range
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
We've been recently exploring ways to select bidirectional text and content
that uses new CSS layout modes such as flex box in visually contagious manner.
Because visually contagious range of content may not be contagious
12 matches
Mail list logo
