On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
> 'mousewheel' was later dropped based on feedback from implementers (Mozilla,
> Microsoft), who expressed a reluctance to implement 'mousewheel', and a lack
> of useful interoperability and concern that any cha
Hi, Anne-
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 9/10/10 7:17 AM):
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:09:38 +0200, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
'mousewheel' was later dropped based on feedback from implementers
(Mozilla, Microsoft), who expressed a reluctance to implement
'mousewheel', and a l
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:09:38 +0200, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
'mousewheel' was later dropped based on feedback from implementers
(Mozilla, Microsoft), who expressed a reluctance to implement
'mousewheel', and a lack of useful interoperability and concern that any
ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/122
Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: DOM3 Events
Defining the 'mousewheel' event and interface was an early decision by the
group, and this was spec
