On Mar 10, 2011, at 22:51 , Daniel Glazman wrote:
Le 10/03/11 16:46, Cameron McCormack a écrit :
We should think of XBL as being a DOM-based thing, rather than an XML-
based thing. Then we can have HTML syntax for the cases where
everything is within a text/html document, and XML syntax for
Le 10/03/11 16:26, Dimitri Glazkov a écrit :
Ok, this is interesting. Which proposal by Google is ghost of Daniel
referring to? I don't think there is one yet?
This kind of things for instance?
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases#Reacting_to_bound_element_state_change
That's just use cases. I used the latest draft of XBL2 for syntax --
might as well be pseudocode at this point.
:DG
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Glazman
daniel.glaz...@disruptive-innovations.com wrote:
Le 10/03/11 16:26, Dimitri Glazkov a écrit :
Ok, this is interesting. Which
Cameron++
Also, this is a public wiki. If you feel like the use cases aren't
covering the problem domain to your satisfaction, please feel
encouraged to make additions.
:DG
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Daniel Glazman:
Ok, so don't focus on the
Le 10/03/11 16:46, Cameron McCormack a écrit :
We should think of XBL as being a DOM-based thing, rather than an XML-
based thing. Then we can have HTML syntax for the cases where
everything is within a text/html document, and XML syntax for the cases
like the ones I brought up, where you
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Daniel Glazman
daniel.glaz...@disruptive-innovations.com wrote:
Le 10/03/11 16:46, Cameron McCormack a écrit :
We should think of XBL as being a DOM-based thing, rather than an XML-
based thing. Then we can have HTML syntax for the cases where
everything is
Le 10/03/11 16:55, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
The HTML serialization of an ordinary web page isn't usable in a user
agent having no knowledge of HTML, either. Why is this different?
Do you have different serializations for another helper technology
called CSS ? No. Why should it be different
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Glazman
daniel.glaz...@disruptive-innovations.com wrote:
Le 10/03/11 16:55, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
The HTML serialization of an ordinary web page isn't usable in a user
agent having no knowledge of HTML, either. Why is this different?
Do you have
On 03/10/2011 02:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
serialization, but it's easy to imagine it also having an XML
serialization for use directly in SVG or similar.
~TJ
Certainly, we'd prefer to have an XML representation of the component
language for use with XForms for similar reasons. XForms
Ian, Leigh, Dimitri, All,
On March 11, the agenda of the so-called Hypertext Coordination Group
[HCG] will include XBL [XBL] to continue related discussions they had
during their Feb 11 call [Feb-11-Mins]. I wasn't present at that call
but based on those meeting minutes and what Leigh said
On 03/09/2011 04:14 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Ian, Leigh, Dimitri, All,
On March 11, the agenda of the so-called Hypertext Coordination Group
[HCG] will include XBL [XBL] to continue related discussions they had
during their Feb 11 call [Feb-11-Mins]. I wasn't present at that call
but based on
This email is written as the position of several Chrome engineers
working in this problem area at Google, though not Google's official
position.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
* What is the latest implementation status of the XBL2 CR [XBL2-CR] and
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
This email is written as the position of several Chrome engineers
working in this problem area at Google, though not Google's official
position.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:14:48 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
* Which members of WebApps want to continue with the XML-based version
of XBL2 as codified in the XBL2 CR? If you are groupin this , what firm
commitments can you make to push the spec along the REC track? Would you
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
* What is the latest implementation status of the XBL2 CR [XBL2-CR] and
Hixie's September 2010 version [XBL-ED] (previously referred to as
XBL2-cutdown)?
I'm not aware of any new developments on either front.
* Which members of WebApps want to
Here's my best understanding of the ansers to these questions from the
Forms WG perspective:
We continue to cheer for the development of a component system for the
HTML5 stack, as it will make things easier for end-user authors and for
framework developers, whether they choose to express
On 3/9/11 1:56 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I do not think the XML-based version makes sense anymore. It's too
complex and has always felt a bit awkward. A set of extensions to HTML
or CSS would make more sense. I really quite liked the idea of using CSS
and having some way of writing markup in
Arthur Barstow:
* Should the WG pursue Dimitri Glazkov's Component Model proposal
[Component]? If yes, who is willing to commit to work on that spec?
I promised Dmitri some use cases from the SVG WG’s perspective, but
haven’t managed to get to working on these yet. Whatever solution we
have in
(off-list)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
svg …
star cx=100 cy=100 points=5/
/svg
svg
x-star cx=100 cy=100 points=5/
/svg
~TJ
Cameron McCormack:
svg …
star cx=100 cy=100 points=5/
/svg
Tab Atkins Jr.:
svg
x-star cx=100 cy=100 points=5/
/svg
Or that. :) I have the feeling that we don’t have agreed upon rules on
how authors are allowed to extend the platform. Whatever we deem is the
“proper” way for
20 matches
Mail list logo
