On 12/6/13 2:04 PM, ext James Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Both Travis and I supported keeping that information in the
boilerplate. The W3C Staff told us it must be removed before the
LC
[ s/public-webapps-testsuite/public-webapps/ Uuugh ]
On 12/7/13 10:22 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
On Dec 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
[ + IanJ; Bcc public-w3process since this thread is an instance of issue-71; (see
Hi Art, all,
On 11/26/2013 08:43 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Earlier today Travis closed the last open bug for DOM Parsing and
Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of
that spec, using the following ED as the basis:
On 12/6/13 7:40 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
On 11/26/2013 08:43 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Earlier today Travis closed the last open bug for DOM Parsing and
Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of
that spec, using the following ED as the basis:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
Even worse is the removal of the reference to the source specification,
given that you know that this is a contentious subject in this WG.
Both Travis and I supported keeping that information in the boilerplate.
