Sorry for having disappeared for a while, odata was keeping me busy. I agree
with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required, so I won't
redundantly mark each with same here, but I have a few comments on one or two
of them below.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.comwrote:
Sorry for having disappeared for a while, odata was keeping me busy. I
agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required,
so I won't redundantly mark each with same here, but I have a few
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience. Most questions below don't seem to need new spec
text.
On Feb 18, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I'm sorry that I let so much IndexedDB feedback get backlogged. In the
future, I'll
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the
interfaces are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync, and the
async API portion is
Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the interfaces
are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync, and the async API
portion is FooRequest. This is true except for IndexedDatabase where the
sync version is simply IndexedDatabase and the async version is
On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the
interfaces are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync,
and the async API portion is FooRequest. This is true except for
IndexedDatabase where the sync version is
