On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 8/29/12 7:59 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
I was wondering if it would make sense to use supplemental interfaces as a
way to generate union types, like in this example:
X implements S
Y implements S
Z implements S
On 8/29/12 12:06 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
It's not impossible in IDL. In fact, it's remarkably easy to define
in IDL. We just don't want to implement multi-inheritance in WebKit
because it's slow. However, I don't see how Andrei's proposal makes
the implementation any more efficient.
Well,
It's not impossible in IDL. In fact, it's remarkably easy to define in IDL.
We
just don't want to implement multi-inheritance in WebKit because it's slow.
However, I don't see how Andrei's proposal makes the implementation any
more efficient.
The proposal tries to reduce the issue this
On 8/29/12 12:40 PM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
It's not impossible in IDL. In fact, it's remarkably easy to define in IDL. We
just don't want to implement multi-inheritance in WebKit because it's slow.
However, I don't see how Andrei's proposal makes the implementation any
more efficient.
The
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 8/29/12 12:40 PM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
It's not impossible in IDL. In fact, it's remarkably easy to define in
IDL. We
just don't want to implement multi-inheritance in WebKit because it's
slow.
However, I don't see
