RE: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere

2009-12-22 Thread Pablo Castro
My apologies for my late reply, I've been out for a while. -Original Message- From: Nikunj R. Mehta [mailto:nikunj.me...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: public-webapps@w3.org WG Cc: Pablo Castro Subject: Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere

Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere

2009-12-11 Thread Nikunj R. Mehta
I have gone ahead and updated the spec to allow option B (only). Please take a look. Nikunj On Dec 8, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: Hi Pablo, Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comments. Hopefully, we can continue the discussion now. Schema changes interact with

Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere

2009-12-08 Thread Nikunj R. Mehta
Hi Pablo, Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comments. Hopefully, we can continue the discussion now. Schema changes interact with the locking model of the database. As I see it, here are several ways in which the API could be designed and the consequences of doing so: A.

Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere

2009-11-24 Thread Shawn Wilsher
On 11/22/09 3:14 PM, Pablo Castro wrote: Does this seem reasonable? This seems reasonable to me. The use case makes sense, and is something I've seen many times in real life. Cheers, Shawn