On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
It sounds like we're all in sync with this new behavior.
These are the various ways in which I see a developer getting a handle to the
database object in order to call transaction():
1. Keeping a global reference around after one of the open method handlers is
executed (i.e. onupgradeneeded
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Should we allow the creation of READ_ONLY or READ_WRITE transactions inside
the oncomplete event handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction?
IE allows this behavior today. However, we noticed that FF's nightly doesn't.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Should we allow the creation of READ_ONLY or READ_WRITE transactions
inside the oncomplete event handler of a VERSION_CHANGE transaction?
IE allows this
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Should we allow the creation of READ_ONLY or READ_WRITE transactions
inside
