On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
> Thanks for diving into the conversation Tab! I guess I just need to wait for
> Elliott to confirm shadow roots create counter scopes.
I talked with him about this at lunch, and he's fine with it.
~TJ
Sprehn; public-webapps
Subject: Re: [shadow-dom] Counters and list item counting
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to clarify a certain situation:
>
> A
>
>
> X
> Y
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to clarify a certain situation:
>
> A
>
>
> X
> Y
>
>
> C
>
>
> How is this case supposed to be rendered?
> 1. A
> 2. 1. X
> 2. Y
> 3. C
>
> or
>
>
A kind reminder this question still requires an answer. I'd like to know if
it's OK to implement lists to act as shown in the first rendering of the
example (i.e counting doesn't cross upper-boundary encapsulation).
Thanks,
Andrei.
On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
I want to clarify a certain situation:
A
X
Y
C
How is this case supposed to be rendered?
1. A
2. 1. X
2. Y
3. C
or
1. A
2,3. X
4. Y
5. C
Basically, do we want the shadow root to become the counting root for t
On 2/19/13 3:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
For example, if you intend for the component to contain a
Oh, effects with components in particular.
Yeah, ignoring the rearrangement done by components for purposes of
counters makes sense to me.
-Boris
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/19/13 2:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> There's some layer-breaching intrinsic to this. You do have to
>> examine your styles to see if you generate a box.
>
> Well, your styles and the styles of all your ancestors in the flattened
> t
On 2/19/13 2:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
There's some layer-breaching intrinsic to this. You do have to
examine your styles to see if you generate a box.
Well, your styles and the styles of all your ancestors in the flattened
tree, yes?
I wouldn't want it to rely on the box tree, though,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/19/13 2:20 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>> Currently in Webkit list item counting is done on the render tree, but
>> we are looking at making it use the DOM instead so that ordered lists
>> work properly in regions.
>
> Why wouldn't they w
On 2/19/13 2:20 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
Currently in Webkit list item counting is done on the render tree, but
we are looking at making it use the DOM instead so that ordered lists
work properly in regions.
Why wouldn't they work properly even if done on the render tree?
Note that if you do
10 matches
Mail list logo
