Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5

2011-12-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 11/30/11 8:17 PM, ext Adrian Bateman wrote: On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:43 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Anne completed his merge XHR and XHR2 merge and the new History section includes information about the merge. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a new WD of XHR using the

Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5

2011-12-01 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:29:37 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: It appears Adrian is proposing: .../TR/XMLHttpRequest/ be a WG Note but it's not clear to me what version of XHR would be used: the 3-Aug-2010 XHR CR, the last ED that was created, some other version?

RE: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5

2011-12-01 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:29:37 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: It appears Adrian is proposing: .../TR/XMLHttpRequest/ be a WG Note but it's not clear to me what version of XHR would be used: the

Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5

2011-12-01 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:44:49 +0100, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: I don't think it's pointless for the reasons I gave. One of the valuable aspects of the W3C is the traceability that comes from the archive in TR space. We have implementations of XHR L1 that, while not 100%, are