Whomever adds delete/continue back to the spec needs to inline into
the spec an explanation of why it's ok per ES5.
Most (all) of us grew up pre ES5 and *believe* that they're truly
reserved keywords and that what you're doing is invalid.
So without inlining the explanation into the spec, you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/15/2010 12:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
We developed a similar trick where we can indicate in the IDL
that different names are used for scripted languages and
There seems to be agreement that delete() is acceptable. Could you file a bug?
/ Jonas
On Monday, July 5, 2010, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/15/2010 12:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:20
PM, Pablo Castro
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:20 PM
So there is a real likelyhood of a browser implementation that
will predate it's associated JS engine's upgrade to ES5?
Feeling a concern isn't really much of technical argument on
it's own, and
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
We developed a similar trick where we can indicate in the IDL that
different names are used for scripted languages and for compiled languages.
So all in all I believe this problem can be overcome. I prefer to
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
We developed a similar trick where we can indicate in the IDL that
different names are used for scripted languages and for compiled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/15/2010 12:40 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com mailto:pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi,
(brief background before jumping out of the blue: I'm working with
Andrei and Jeremy with the IDB implementation..)
I'd like to mention the IDBCursor::continue is also problematic, as
afaict continue is a reserved keyword in JS?
oh, delete seems to be reserved as well:
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline
February 2
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From: Kris Zyp
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.comwrote:
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Orlow
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline
February 2
On Fri, Jun
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: Kris Zyp [mailto:k...@sitepen.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline
February 2
On 6/10/2010 4:15 PM, Pablo Castro wrote
-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline
February 2
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From: Kris Zyp [mailto:k...@sitepen.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/2/2010 12:48 PM, Kris Zyp wrote:
On 2/1/2010 8:17 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
[snip]
the existence of currentTransaction in the same class).
beginTransaction would capture semantics more accurately.
b.
ObjectStoreSync.delete: delete
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Kris Zyp
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline
February 2
I see that in the trunk version of the spec [1] that delete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/10/2010 4:15 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kris Zyp
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:49 AM Subject: Re: Seeking
pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API
From: Kris Zyp [mailto:k...@sitepen.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline
February 2
On 6/10/2010 4:15 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/1/2010 8:17 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
[snip]
the existence of currentTransaction in the same class).
beginTransaction would capture semantics more accurately. b.
ObjectStoreSync.delete: delete is a Javascript keyword, can we
use remove
A few comments inline marked with [PC].
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Nikunj Mehta
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 11:37 PM
To: Kris Zyp
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A few comments I've been meaning to suggest:
* count on KeyRange - Previously I had asked if there would be a way
to get a count of the number of objects within a given key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A few comments I've been meaning to suggest:
* count on KeyRange - Previously I had asked if there would be a way
to get a count of the number of objects within a given key range. The
addition of the KeyRange interface seems to be a step towards
to the working group next Monday
(25th Jan).
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:48 PM
To: Maciej Stachowiak
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps; Jeremy Orlow
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
Nikunj would like to move the Indexed Database API spec to Last Call
Working Draft (LCWD):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/
If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps@w3.org by
February
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Nikunj would like to move the Indexed Database API spec to Last Call Working
Draft (LCWD):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/
If you have any comments,
For what it's worth we are in the same situation at mozilla
On Jan 19, 2010 3:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at
4:50 AM, Arthur Barstow...
We at Apple are also in reviewing the spec and would also like
24 matches
Mail list logo
