On May 23, 2012, at 20:40 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
how does ReSpec.js use or promote the discouraged particulars?
Most specifications (if not all) using ReSpec.js have this problem. I
believe that is because it is the default setup.
Yup, it's just the default setup. As I've said before,
On May 23, 2012, at 20:30 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
wrote:
Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively competition
between ReSpec and Anolis. Do we need this tussle? Can we not just
decide which tool to use?
On May 23, 2012, at 14:45 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I have made some updates to the howto spec wiki page outlining how
you should go about writing a specification, with some emphasis on
specifications for APIs.
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Howto_spec
In particular the Patterns and Legacy
There is a list called spec-p...@w3.org which is about things to do with
making specs. I.e. for editors, in particular. I forwarded some stuff from
this thread there - there are other preprocessing systems around,
including XML toolsets. I think this stuff used to be documented
somewhere,
This is neat! I especially appreciated the Method/Attribute patterns.
I will use this.
Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively competition
between ReSpec and Anolis. Do we need this tussle? Can we not just
decide which tool to use?
:DG
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Anne van
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Hi,
I have made some updates to the howto spec wiki page outlining how
you should go about writing a specification, with some emphasis on
specifications for APIs.
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Howto_spec
In
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
This is neat! I especially appreciated the Method/Attribute patterns.
I will use this.
Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively competition
between ReSpec and Anolis. Do we need this tussle? Can we not
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
This is neat! I especially appreciated the Method/Attribute patterns.
I will use this.
Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively competition
between ReSpec and Anolis. Do we need this tussle? Can we not just
decide which tool to use?
It's a tradeoff:
ReSpec.js pro:
* No setup costs
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
I would like to see more explanation of some statements under the Legacy
DOM-style section, particularly:
what is the particular style of defining methods and attributes that is to
be discouraged?
Added the separation of
10 matches
Mail list logo
