Re: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-19 Thread Tobie Langel
. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan -Original Message- From: Karl Dubost [mailto:ka...@opera.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:04 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: Ian Hickson; Stefan Hakansson LK; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Regarding app notification and wake up Le 9 mars 2012 à 19:43, SULLIVAN

Re: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-12 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:10:19 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote: The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And

Re: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-12 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 9 mars 2012 à 19:43, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L a écrit : This is different from the earlier discussion on extending SSE to connectionless event sources, as there's no assumption the Webapp is running in this case. If the Webapp *is* running, it's within the scope of what we have discussed

RE: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-12 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
notification and wake up Le 9 mars 2012 à 19:43, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L a écrit : This is different from the earlier discussion on extending SSE to connectionless event sources, as there's no assumption the Webapp is running in this case. If the Webapp *is* running, it's within the scope of what we

Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread Stefan Hakansson LK
The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain scenarios the resource use (e.g. power) is very important. However, this kind of

Re: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread Scott Wilson
On 9 Mar 2012, at 08:10, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain scenarios the resource use (e.g.

RE: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
discussion in Webapps. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan -Original Message- From: Scott Wilson [mailto:scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 6:35 AM To: Stefan Hakansson LK Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Regarding app notification and wake up On 9 Mar 2012, at 08:10, Stefan

Re: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain scenarios the resource use (e.g.

RE: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Message- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 4:09 PM To: Stefan Hakansson LK Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Regarding app notification and wake up On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify

RE: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: Stefan may respond with more detail, but the use cases we submitted for WebRTC consideration describe this as the ability to invoke an application and pass an event to it, whether it is running (or not) at the time of the event reception by

RE: Regarding app notification and wake up

2012-03-09 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
-webapps@w3.org Subject: RE: Regarding app notification and wake up On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: Stefan may respond with more detail, but the use cases we submitted for WebRTC consideration describe this as the ability to invoke an application and pass an event to it, whether