Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)

2011-11-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thursday, November 24, 2011, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote: On 2011-11-24 00:52, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au wrote: The alternative option (find / findAll / matches can accept explicit :scope, but will otherwise

Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)

2011-11-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-11-24 00:52, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au wrote: The alternative option (find / findAll / matches can accept explicit :scope, but will otherwise imply :scope) seems to be where all the ambiguity lies. What exact cases are

Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)

2011-11-24 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote: On 2011-11-24 00:52, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au  wrote: The alternative option (find / findAll / matches can accept explicit :scope, but will otherwise