While reviewing the new Web Apps WG charter, I noticed that the
current (2008) charter does not list this deliverable. It also says:
The WebApps WG will not take on new Recommendation-Track Widgets
deliverables without new charter review.
Could someone point me to the justification for
Here are my personal comments on the document:
1. Overall, it's a good a light document. I agree the feature is needed.
2. I don't understand why this is restricted to Widgets...
A HTML page can be dropped on a desktop or be rendered chromeless
by Mozilla Prism. A web page can be
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your comments!
On Mar 10, 2010, at 17:57 , Daniel Glazman wrote:
1. Overall, it's a good a light document. I agree the feature is needed.
Glad that you think so.
2. I don't understand why this is restricted to Widgets...
A HTML page can be dropped on a desktop or
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
3. why maxiMIZED and only mini?
Hmmm, because they were added at different times? :) It's a good point, is
there a preference between -mized or not?
Since the alternative is to use maxi for consistency... I think I
prefer
On Mar 10, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
2. I don't understand why this is restricted to Widgets...
A HTML page can be dropped on a desktop or be rendered chromeless
by Mozilla Prism. A web page can be rendered in a browser in
fullscreen mode, etc. All values still make
forward from www-style; sorry I forgot public-webapps@w3.org
in my message.
/Daniel
Message original
Sujet: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature;
deadline March 17
Date de renvoi : Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:47:12 +
De (renvoi) : www-st...@w3.org
Date
This is the start of a 2-week pre-LCWD call for comments re the View
Modes Media Feature spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/Overview.html
If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps@w3.org
by March 17.
Note the Process Document states the following regarding
