Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-07-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:57:06 +0200, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them. This is what I have so far: [...] Are there any others people are aware

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-07-16 Thread Simon Pieters
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:57:06 +0200, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them. This is what I have so far: HTML 5 http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-07-16 Thread Robin Berjon
On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:27 , Simon Pieters wrote: Web DOM Core http://simon.html5.org/specs/web-dom-core This spec would probably benefit from being moved to W3C space. As it happens, I would like to know if someone is interested in editing Web DOM Core. Maybe someone from Apple or Mozilla?

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Robin Berjon
On Jun 27, 2009, at 22:24 , Doug Schepers wrote: As we talked about at the SVG F2F, we need to have a discussion about what the exit criteria for Web IDL will be, since the implementations are actually other specs, and there is concurrent development between those specs and Web IDL. This

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Robin Berjon: I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place? Could it simply be a Note? I’d be reluctant to make it a note, given the normative requirements it makes of implementations of a given IDL fragment. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Doug Schepers: As we talked about at the SVG F2F, we need to have a discussion about what the exit criteria for Web IDL will be, since the implementations are actually other specs, and there is concurrent development between those specs and Web IDL. This seems to be a special case with

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Doug Schepers
Hi, Cam- Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:10 AM): Robin Berjon: I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place? Could it simply be a Note? I’d be reluctant to make it a note, given the normative requirements it makes of implementations of a given IDL fragment.

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Doug Schepers
Hi, again- Oops, email sent too soon... I need to disable the keyboard shortcut for Send on Thunderbird, it's very annoying. Email finished inline Doug Schepers wrote (on 6/28/09 3:37 PM): Hi, Cam- Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:10 AM): Robin Berjon: I wonder what the value is

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Doug Schepers: Maybe we should have a LC to draw out these comments... Using LC to get detailed review seems fine. I suppose it will be in the interests of authors of specs dependent on Web IDL to ensure that the details are correct before it gets more mature. if not now, what timeframe are

Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them. This is what I have so far: HTML 5 http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/ Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ The Web Sockets API