On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
The StringEncoding proposal is the best path forward because it
provides correct behavior in all cases.
Do you mean this one?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
The StringEncoding proposal is the best path forward because it
provides correct
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I don't see it being a particularly bad thing if vendors expose more
translation encodings. I've only come across one project that would use
them. Binary and utf8 handle everything else I've come across, and I can use
On Jan 12, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On
On 1/12/2012 10:03 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com wrote:
I don't see it being a particularly bad thing if vendors expose more
translation encodings. I've only come across one project that would use
them. Binary and utf8 handle
Currently, we can asynchronously use BlobBuilder with FileReader to get
an array buffer from a string.
We can of course, use code to convert String.fromCharCode into a
Uint8Array, but it's ugly.
The StringEncoding proposal seems a bit much for most web use:
On 1/11/2012 2:49 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
mailto:ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Currently, we can asynchronously use BlobBuilder with FileReader
to get an array buffer from a string.
We can of course, use code to
On 1/11/2012 2:49 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
mailto:ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Currently, we can asynchronously use BlobBuilder with FileReader
to get an array buffer from a string.
We can of course, use code to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Currently, we can asynchronously use BlobBuilder with FileReader to get an
array buffer from a string.
We can of course, use code to convert String.fromCharCode into a
Uint8Array, but it's ugly.
The StringEncoding
The StringEncoding proposal is the best path forward because it
provides correct behavior in all cases. Adding String conversions
directly to the typed array spec will introduce dependencies that are
strongly undesirable, and make it much harder to implement the core
spec. Hopefully Josh can
On 1/11/2012 3:12 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
The StringEncoding proposal is the best path forward because it
provides correct behavior in all cases. Adding String conversions
directly to the typed array spec will introduce dependencies that are
strongly undesirable, and make it much harder to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
The StringEncoding proposal is the best path forward because it
provides correct behavior in all cases. Adding String conversions
directly to the typed array spec will introduce dependencies that are
strongly undesirable,
On 1/11/12 6:03 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
Is there any instance in practice where DOMString as exposed to the
scripting environment is not implemented as a unicode string?
I don't know what you mean by that.
The point is, it's trivial to construct JS strings that contain
arbitrary
On 1/11/2012 4:22 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/11/12 6:03 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
Is there any instance in practice where DOMString as exposed to the
scripting environment is not implemented as a unicode string?
I don't know what you mean by that.
The point is, it's trivial to
On 1/11/2012 7:44 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
On 1/11/2012 4:22 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/11/12 6:03 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
Web Storage, also, only works with unicode.
I'm not familiar with the relevant part of Web Storage. Can you cite
the relevant part please?
The character
16 matches
Mail list logo
