| ATT
-Original Message-
From: Eric Uhrhane [mailto:er...@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:42 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File
: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:42 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
Sorry about the delay in response; I've been out of the office
The question of where you are represented and your ability to
participate cuts both ways - the same is true for us. I think if the
browser vendors want their products really to be seen as compatible
with
the Web application space (as compared to just dynamic Web pages),
they
will support the
[mailto:a...@mozilla.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:48 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian Fette; Web Applications
Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
On 6/15/10 1:15 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
We would
Hi David,
Thanks for your questions.
On 6/16/10 2:16 AM, David Rogers wrote:
The question of where you are represented and your ability to
participate cuts both ways - the same is true for us. I think if the
browser vendors want their products really to be seen as compatible
with
Hi Arun,
-Original Message-
From: Arun Ranganathan [mailto:a...@mozilla.com]
Sent: 16 June 2010 19:48
On 6/16/10 2:16 AM, David Rogers wrote:
The question of where you are represented and your ability to
participate cuts both ways - the same is true for us. I think if the
On 6/16/10 12:59 PM, David Rogers wrote:
[DAVID] I was actually referring to:
http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/privacy-reqs/
(As mentioned in previous correspondence, I think securing an API and
privacy can be decoupled, but both are very relevant topics).
I've read that document and think that
Sorry about the delay in response; I've been out of the office for the
past 10 days. [Also, sorry Bryan--I forgot to reply-all.]
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3...@att.com wrote:
I am not meaning to be unfair, perhaps the message is not coming through
clearly
On 6/15/10 1:15 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
We would not be in favor of this transfer. We believe this API needs to
be developed in the DAP group, as our vision for its functionality was
driven by the input from BONDI and in general as a *device* API (as
compared to an abstracted API
Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
On 6/15/10 1:15 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
We would not be in favor of this transfer. We believe this API needs
to
be developed in the DAP group, as our vision for its functionality was
driven by the input from BONDI
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3...@att.com wrote:
Arun,
The basic concern I have is with the notion of browsers as the only
Web context and use-case that matters. The browser-based model for API
integration view (as I understand your position) is that the user
On 6/15/10 2:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
Arun,
The basic concern I have is with the notion of browsers as the only
Web context and use-case that matters. The browser-based model for API
integration view (as I understand your position) is that the user must
be actively involved in
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:48 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3...@att.com wrote:
Jonas,
I guess there might be a parting of the ways here, resulting from
differing (I guess some would say, incompatible) use cases and the APIs
that support them.
If the current File APIs in DAP are expected
.org; Ian Fette; Web Applications
Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
On 6/15/10 2:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
Arun,
The basic concern I have is with the notion of browsers as the only
Web context and use-case that matters. The browser-based model
[mailto:a...@mozilla.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:53 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian Fette; Web Applications
Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
On 6/15/10 2:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote
: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:42 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
Hi,
Am I correct in thinking that what you find too restrictive
Bryan,
On 6/15/10 3:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
5) do the above programmatically in Javascript (not dependent just upon
user selection of an input element and interaction with a file selector)
6) provide security for this using the policy-framework approach as
being defined for
Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
As I understand it, #5 (programmatic access to files without user
interaction) is indeed supported via the getFile method. But again,
this is only within the sandboxed filesystem, not for an arbitrary file
on the device.
As for #6, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
