Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution

2010-04-01 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:07, Frederick Hirsch wrote: Note that this specifically means that a ds:Reference to the ds:Object element and the ds:Reference to config.xml will each require a ds:Transform element to specify canonicalization method. That's not true for config.xml -- that file is not

Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution

2010-03-31 Thread Frederick Hirsch
Based on some feedback I have a revision to the Normative change (same intent) and also a clarification that might be helpful: (A) Revised Proposal Disallow all Transforms except for a single canonicalization transform that is required for every ds:Reference that needs XML content

Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution

2010-03-29 Thread Frederick Hirsch
ISSUE: Widget Signature : Not specifying Canonicalization algorithm explicitly Detail: The current Widget Signature specification does not allow the use of XML Signature Transforms, however the only means to explicitly specify the Canonicalization method to use to use a transform (in