Cameron McCormack wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
Why do we need the FunctionOnly/PropertyOnly feature? In gecko we don't
have that functionality and it hasn't caused any problems that I can
think of.
I took David’s feedback to mean that sometimes you want to state that
a single-function interface
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:32:02 +0100, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
var xhrConstructor = iframe.contentWindow.XMLHttpRequest;
iframe.src='http://attackee.example.com/';
.
.
var xhr = new xhrConstructor();
When the constructor is invoked here, the associated document of its
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
The point is that there *is* no document pointer until you call the
constructur - per the spec. And once that script calls the constructor
and the document pointer is created, the associated window has a
different document in it from a
Hi Kai!
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I have an action to tell you what I've been upto WRT widgets
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action02
I've started working one day a week on widget testing. My own git repo is
here:
On 24 Nov 2008, at 22:46, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license
Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good.
Seems to be some inconsistency between src, uri, url, href btw that
you can easily pick up in the relaxng scheme.
I'm
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Nov 2008, at 22:46, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license
Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good.
Seems to be some inconsistency between
Web Apps WG,
Would it be possible to add setCapture() (as supported in IE; see below)
to DOM3 Events? It seems more appropriate to have it there than in HTML5.
Note that I don't think we'd need releaseCapture(); we should just say
that capture is canceled when the mouse is released if it was
