On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
On 15.09.2010 11:56, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 9/15/10 2:47 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
So it's possible that the original behavior was just an oversight that
then got copied. Someone with access to a browser version
On 16.09.2010 09:39, Darin Fisher wrote:
...
Adding a .followRedirect method means that developers can choose to use
it or not. If they want to manually construct the redirected request,
then they can do so using a new XHR object. However, if the use case is
only auditing redirects, then being
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 9/15/10 2:47 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
So it's possible that the original behavior was just an oversight that
then got copied. Someone with access to a browser version control system
from before 1998 would need to look
On 9/16/10 12:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
If you're interested in this topic, I'd encourage you to share your
perspective with the httpbis working group.
I'm not sure there's anything else to share, actually. Sounds like
things are well in hand here.
-Boris
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Heh, I've also been thinking about this exact issue lately. There is a
similar question for IDBCursor.delete.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think it's clear what IDBCursor
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:50:41 +0200, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
If using followRedirect() is easy, but manually following it is hard,
people might choose the wrong approach just because it's easier.
Well, what is wrong and what is right is still an open issue in the HTTP
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Heh, I've also been thinking about this exact issue lately. There is a
similar question for IDBCursor.delete.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:55 AM,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Heh, I've also been thinking about this exact issue lately. There is a
similar question for IDBCursor.delete.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:55 AM,
cc: public-webapps
Hi Claes,
Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Thanks for clarifying your proposal.
I interpret you so that you are proposing standardization of a general concept of
packaged and installed web applications. Something like
http://code.google.com/chrome/apps/docs/index.html
ISSUE-133 (keyCode and charCode): Consider specifying keyCode and charCode
[DOM3 Events]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/133
Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: DOM3 Events
Simon Pieters
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2010JulSep/0160.html:
[[
Please specify keyCode
On 16.09.2010 11:32, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:50:41 +0200, Julian Reschke
julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
If using followRedirect() is easy, but manually following it is hard,
people might choose the wrong approach just because it's easier.
Well, what is wrong and what is
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker sysbot+trac...@w3.org wrote:
ISSUE-133 (keyCode and charCode): Consider specifying keyCode and charCode
[DOM3 Events]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/133
Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: DOM3
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Basically, and practically, use keyCode in keyDown and keyUp events,
and charCode in keyDown events (except in Opera, where keyCode can be
used as a fallback).
Sorry, I obviously meant charCode in keyPress events.
--
Thomas Broyer
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
cc: public-webapps
Hi Claes,
Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Thanks for clarifying your proposal.
I interpret you so that you are proposing standardization of a general
concept of packaged and installed web applications.
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
cc: public-webapps
Hi Claes,
Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Thanks for clarifying your proposal.
I interpret you so that you are proposing standardization of a general
concept of packaged and installed
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi All,
Simply wondering why WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures aren't
used to deploy js applications which run in the main browser context?
I guess because they all have counterparts on the Web
On 9/16/10 6:10 PM, Nathan wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
cc: public-webapps
Hi Claes,
Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Thanks for clarifying your proposal.
I interpret you so that you are proposing standardization of a
On 9/16/10 6:17 PM, Nathan wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi All,
Simply wondering why WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures aren't
used to deploy js applications which run in the main browser context?
I guess because
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9/16/10 6:10 PM, Nathan wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
As above. I thought that was what we (Web Apps WG - Widgets) have been
doing for the last 5 years?
Maybe I've missed part of the specifications - are you telling me that I
can package up an HTML,CSS,JS based
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Heh, I've also been thinking about this exact issue lately. There is a
similar question for IDBCursor.delete.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:55 AM,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Heh, I've also been thinking about this exact issue lately. There is a
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Wait a sec. What are the use cases for non-object cursors anyway? They
made perfect sense back when we allowed explicit index management, but
now
How about this?
For a move/copy of a file on top of existing file, or a directory on
top of an existing empty directory, you get an automatic overwrite.
A move/copy of a file on top of an existing directory, or of a
directory on top of an existing file, will always fail.
A move/copy of a file or
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we should leave in openObjectCursor/getObject but remove
openCursor/get for now. We can then revisit any of these features as soon
as there are implementations (both in the UAs and in web sites) mature
enough for
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
I think that obtaining the resolved Location for the redirect is the
most tricky part, and we should come up with a solution where that is
also available for people who do not want the default browser behavior.
I
2010/9/16 Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
How about this?
For a move/copy of a file on top of existing file, or a directory on
top of an existing empty directory, you get an automatic overwrite.
A move/copy of a file on
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 9/7/10 10:08 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Jian Li wrote:
Hi,
Several specs,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we should leave in openObjectCursor/getObject but remove
openCursor/get for now. We can then revisit any of these features as
soon
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
2010/9/16 Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
How about this?
For a move/copy of a file on top of existing file, or a directory on
top of an existing
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Wait a sec. What are the use cases for non-object cursors anyway? They
Hi Nathan,
On 9/16/10 7:38 PM, Nathan wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9/16/10 6:10 PM, Nathan wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
As above. I thought that was what we (Web Apps WG - Widgets) have been
doing for the last 5 years?
Maybe I've missed part of the specifications - are you telling me
31 matches
Mail list logo
