Suggestion (redirection)

2011-04-15 Thread Everton Sales
I'm implementing the WebSocket my company's servers, and would arrange an OPCODE which means redirection in my case I set the code %x6 for this function.

HTML5 Filesystem API feedback

2011-04-15 Thread Robert Ginda
Hello public-webapps, I've spent a bit of time with the filesystem API recently, building out a set of common file dialogs (open, save-as, etc) for ChromeOS. We have a private API call to get access to a special filesystem that contains the user's downloads folder and the mounted external

Re: Suggestion (redirection)

2011-04-15 Thread Adam Barth
Feedback about the WebSocket protocol should be sent to the IETF HyBi working group: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi Adam On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Everton Sales everton.sales.bra...@gmail.com wrote: I'm implementing the WebSocket my company's servers, and would arrange an

Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback

2011-04-15 Thread Eric Uhrhane
Robert: First of all, thanks for the feedback. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Robert Ginda rgi...@chromium.org wrote: Hello public-webapps, I've spent a bit of time with the filesystem API recently, building out a set of common file dialogs (open, save-as, etc) for ChromeOS.  We have a

RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader

2011-04-15 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 12:08 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: FileReader is extremely similar to XMLHttpRequest. The main difference is in how you initiate the request (.open/.send vs. .readAsX). This similarity is even getting stronger now that XHR gets .result. So I think there are good

Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader

2011-04-15 Thread Arun Ranganathan
On 4/15/11 2:57 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote: On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 12:08 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: FileReader is extremely similar to XMLHttpRequest. The main difference is in how you initiate the request (.open/.send vs. .readAsX). This similarity is even getting stronger now that XHR gets

RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader

2011-04-15 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Friday, April 15, 2011 12:16 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: On 4/15/11 2:57 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote: With this in mind, I don't personally have a strong feeling either way between having to call abort() explicitly or having readAsXXX implicitly call abort(). I've discussed it with others

Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback

2011-04-15 Thread Robert Ginda
Hi Eric, Thanks for your reply, my comments are inline... On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote: Robert: First of all, thanks for the feedback. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Robert Ginda rgi...@chromium.org wrote: Hello public-webapps, I've spent a bit

Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader

2011-04-15 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: On Friday, April 15, 2011 12:16 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: On 4/15/11 2:57 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote: With this in mind, I don't personally have a strong feeling either way between having to call abort()

Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback

2011-04-15 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Robert Ginda rgi...@chromium.org wrote: * The FileError object is a bit awkward to work with.  I found that I frequently had every reason to expect my calls to succeed (because they were a follow-on to something that already succeeded), but I wanted to log the

Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback

2011-04-15 Thread Arun Ranganathan
On 4/15/11 6:29 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Robert Gindargi...@chromium.org wrote: * The FileError object is a bit awkward to work with. I found that I frequently had every reason to expect my calls to succeed (because they were a follow-on to something that