Hello,
I have some comments on the Battery Status API.
I was wondering why it was that the battery status API is exposed
using Events (and adding an additional requirement When an event
listener is registered with the event type batterystatus, then the
User Agent must dispatch a
Hello Andres,
The Battery Status API is deliverable of the Device APIs Working Group,
so I'm copying the group's list public-device-a...@w3.org.
(keeping public-webapps in BCC FYI)
Dom
Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 22:44 -0700, Andres Riofrio a écrit :
I have some comments on the Battery Status
[ Bcc public-webapps; please reply to public-device-a...@w3.org ]
As noted in the Battery Status Event spec, comments for the spec should
be sent to the DAP WG's mail list:
public-device-a...@w3.org mailto:public-device-a...@w3.org
On Jun/6/2011 1:44 AM, ext Andres Riofrio wrote:
Hello,
I
Given the positive support indicated, one way forward with respect to
WebApps is for Adam to put his spec into WebApps' Mercurial repo and to
continue related discussions on public-webapps.
Note, WebApps cannot publish this spec (in w3.org/TR/) until the spec is
included in the WG's charter.
Hi Arun, Jonas, All,
The last publication of the File API spec [ED] was last October so it
would be good to publish a new Working Draft in w3.org/TR/.
Since Tracker shows 0 bugs for the spec [Tracker] and the ED does not
appear to identify any open issues, does the spec meet the Last Call
Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 08:55 -0400, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
The last publication of the File API spec [ED] was last October so it
would be good to publish a new Working Draft in w3.org/TR/.
Since Tracker shows 0 bugs for the spec [Tracker] and the ED does not
appear to identify any open
The first step in section 4.1 Opening the database stipulates:
1. If these steps fail for any reason, return a error with the appropriate code
and abort this algorithm.
What are the expected error codes for IDBFactory.open?
Israel
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
The first step in section 4.1 Opening the database stipulates:
1. If these steps fail for any reason, return a error with the appropriate
code and abort this algorithm.
What are the expected error codes for
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I noticed that we don't define the default direction of a cursor when
accessing records. Both, Firefox and Chrome go from smallest to
largest. This seems
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I noticed that we don't define the default direction of a cursor when
accessing
What about this:
The default value for the range will be null which implies:
IDBKeyRange.lower = undefined
IDBKeyRange.upper = undefined
IDBKeyRange.lowerOpen = false
IDBKeyRange.upperOpen = false
The default value for the direction will be IDBCursor.NEXT.
Israel
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:03
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote:
However, I would like to propose one additional feature: a cryptographically
secure random number generator (CSRNG). This is a badly missed feature
today. [And just as I'm posting, I now see that Rich Tibbett beat me to
Have you considered using the WebIDL dictionary definition as a mechanism to
define the optional parameters in the IDBDatabase.createObjectStore method?
Advantages at using the dictionary definition on WebIDL for optional parameters:
. Provides a fixed, ordered set of key-value pairs
. Removes
Unknown err might make sense for implementation specific bugs/issues. (If
it's not deeply tied to an implementation, it shouldn't be unknown
though.)
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException
name attribute [File API]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/181
Raised by: Adrian Bateman
On product: File API
FileError [1] and FileException [2] both define a DOMString attribute called
name that
WebApps-ISSUE-182 (OperationNotAllowed): File API introduces a new
OperationNotAllowed exception where other specs have an error code [File API]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/182
Raised by: Adrian Bateman
On product: File API
The File API adds an OperationNotAllowed exception
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
What about this:
The default value for the range will be null which implies:
IDBKeyRange.lower = undefined
IDBKeyRange.upper = undefined
IDBKeyRange.lowerOpen = false
IDBKeyRange.upperOpen = false
Well, currently
Sure, that would be much more efficient. And I agree with others on
that thread that the API should be non-blocking, non-failing, i.e.
akin to Linux /dev/urandom.
But my more important point was the second API: allow the code to
mix in any available entropy:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Have you considered using the WebIDL dictionary definition as a mechanism to
define the optional parameters in the IDBDatabase.createObjectStore method?
Advantages at using the dictionary definition on WebIDL for
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote:
**
Sure, that would be much more efficient. And I agree with others on that
thread that the API should be non-blocking, non-failing, i.e. akin to Linux
/dev/urandom.
But my more important point was the second API:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Eliot Graff eliot...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
In a "real" browser, there should indeed be enough entropy, mostly
from user actions. I don't know if this group cares about
server-side uses, but if it does, servers have a real problem
obtaining entropy. Especially in virtualized settings.
Thanks,
Yaron
Jonas Sicking:
The one outstanding issue that I know about is that we want IndexedDB
to throw if any unknown parameters are specified. I don't know if
WebIDL dictionaries support those yet. Or if it's something that we
can specify in prose.
I was waiting to see if anyone else had any views on
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
The one outstanding issue that I know about is that we want IndexedDB
to throw if any unknown parameters are specified. I don't know if
WebIDL dictionaries support those yet. Or if it's something that we
Jonas Sicking:
I don't know about other APIs. But it does seem very unfortunate to
simply silently ignore unknown arguments to
IDBDatabase.createObjectStore. Though then again, extra (and thus
unknown) arguments are ignored to all other DOM calls.
Right (not as defined in Web IDL at the
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker sysbot+trac...@w3.org wrote:
FileError [1] and FileException [2] both define a DOMString attribute called
name that contains the name of the error/exception constant as a string.
Since this is not a useful human
The optional mimeType parameter to Entry[Sync].toURL is redundant with
url.createObjectURL. It also doesn't work with the URL format
proposed in the notes and now implemented in Chromium. I have removed
it from the spec.
Eric
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au
wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
However it appears that that extended attribute is not present in
newer versions of the WebIDL spec. Cameron, is this something that is
planned
The parameter of IDBDatabase.setVersion is defined in the WebIDL as
[TreatNullAs=EmptyString] but in the method definition it says that the
parameter cannot be nullable. Do we want to enable null values?
Israel
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au
wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
However it appears that that extended attribute is not present in
30 matches
Mail list logo
