On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
end-of-microtask or end-of-task everywhere. And yes, some parsing /
networking details may unfortunately be exposed,
but in a way which should be quite random. Web devs just can't really rely
on network packages to be
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fiwrote:
Ojan points out
that simply using end-of-task could expose low-level implementation
detail of the parser to script (such as how much parsing is done in a
single task
before the parser yields).
Does Firefox do
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
By my reading, the spec does not clearly specify what the 'origin' should
be. IDBFactory.open/deleteDatabase say Let origin be the origin of the
IDBEnvironment used to access this IDBFactory. The IDL states Window
implements
On 06/20/2012 10:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
mailto:olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
Ojan points out
that simply using end-of-task could expose low-level implementation
detail of the parser to script (such as how
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:19:22 +0200, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
...
This is not a good argument. qSA is used often enough, and has a long
enough name, that the name is actually a pretty significant
Hi,
The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C
Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have
missed something and would therefore appreciate your review of
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/raw-file/tip/Overview.html and any
comments you might have
On 20 June 2012 10:58, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Hi,
The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C
Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have
missed something and would therefore appreciate your review of
On 06/20/2012 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Hi,
The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C
Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have
missed something and would therefore appreciate your review of
On Jun 19, 2012, at 13:29 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
Dave - it appears this CfC passed. Unless I hear otherwise from you, I will
assume DAP will take care of the Transition Request and Publication Request.
Yes, we'll take care of that. The draft will be published under joint ownership
between
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
Seems like tags are global. I think they should be per origin.
Yes I believe they should be.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/rev/563e9af218b9
Thanks,
--
Anne — Opera Software
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:30:08 +0200, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
Seems like tags are global. I think they should be per origin.
Yes I believe they should be.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
In the default case yes. Can you use something to change that (a la
from-origin)?
I don't really see how. Do you have an example where it makes sense?
--
Anne — Opera Software
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
Seems like tags are global. I think they should be per origin.
Yes I believe they should be.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:25 PM, John Gregg john...@google.com wrote:
Can we either go back to the original language where in the showing
algorithm you compare both tag and origin (add origin to the model),
Sure.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/rev/93c6983ce465
--
Anne — Opera Software
On 2012-06-20 10:42, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
In other words we have the same arguments that we had five years ago,
when we settled on querySelector as the one that provoked least objection.
...
But spending another few months arguing about it hasn't proven that we
are any wiser, nor
20.06.2012, 18:26, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au:
In particular, is there really value in adding two distinct methods that
differ only by whether they return 1 element or a collection? Resolving
this issue first would help with resolving the naming issue.
It should be noted that
It should be noted that JQuery/sizzle does not use querySelector() at all,
AFAICS. It only uses querySelectorAll() and sometimes switches to
.getElementById() or document.body.
I took a look at using querySelector as an optimization a while back but it
did not seem to make a significant
20.06.2012, 18:14, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au:
4. Support for returning elements that are not descendants of the
context object.
This feature allows a selector to be constructed such that it matches an
element anywhere in the tree relative to the context element. This
feature
On 6/20/12 10:52 AM, Dave Methvin wrote:
This test html is based on the
msn.com http://msn.com home page to be representative of a big
real-life document.
For what it's worth, that document has about 2200 DOM nodes. That's two
orders of magnitude smaller than big real-life documents. This
On 6/20/12 11:34 AM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
It's natural to suppose that searching for just _first_ matching element and
returning immediately once it's found should be much _faster_ than searching
for _all_ matching elements (be it 100 or 1000 elements) even if we need just
first
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fiwrote:
Ojan points out
that simply using end-of-task could expose low-level implementation
detail of the parser to script (such as how much parsing is
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 06/20/2012 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Hi,
The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C
Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have
missed something and would
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Andrew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 06/20/2012 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Hi,
The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C
Last Call meaning
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fiwrote:
Ojan points out
that simply using end-of-task could expose low-level
* Jonas Sicking wrote:
I can't think of any cases where you would *not* want these to fire
for parser mutations.
For example if you are building an XBL-like widget library which uses
the DOM under a node to affect behavior or rendering of some other
object. If you attach the widget before the
25 matches
Mail list logo
