On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Austin William Wright wrote:
> I believe the term is "congestion control" such as the TCP congestion
> control algorithm.
As I've heard the term used, "congestion control" is slightly
different than "flow control" or "tcp backpressure", but they are
related concept
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Domenic Denicola
> wrote:
> > From: Takeshi Yoshino [mailto:tyosh...@google.com]
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Domenic Denicola <
> dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> >>> Hey all, I was directed
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Domenic Denicola
wrote:
> From: Takeshi Yoshino [mailto:tyosh...@google.com]
>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Domenic Denicola
>> wrote:
>>> Hey all, I was directed here by Anne helpfully posting to
>>> public-script-coord and es-discuss. I would love it if
From: Takeshi Yoshino [tyosh...@google.com]
> Sorry, which one? stream.Readable's readable event and read method?
Exactly.
> I agree flow control is an issue not addressed well yet and needs to be fixed.
I would definitely suggest thinking about it as soon as possible, since it will
likely hav
From: Takeshi Yoshino [mailto:tyosh...@google.com]
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Domenic Denicola
> wrote:
>> Hey all, I was directed here by Anne helpfully posting to
>> public-script-coord and es-discuss. I would love it if a summary of what
>> proposal is currently under discussion: i
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> The only thing peeps asked for consistently was the knowledge of when
> the in-a-document state changes. I haven't heard any other requests
> for callbacks.
I'm having a hard time following how we're designing this thing. Are
we just follo
