Re: Blob URL Origin

2014-05-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: For blob URLs (and prolly filesystem and indexeddb) we put the origin in the URL and define a way to extract it again so new URL(blob).origin does the right thing. Yup. For fetching blob URLs (and prolly filesystem

Data URL Origin (Was: Blob URL Origin)

2014-05-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: How do we deal with data URLs? Obviously you can always get a resource out of them. But when should the response of fetching one be tainted and when should it not be? And there's a somewhat similar question for about

[Bug 24288] [Shadow]: Revert shadow element as a function call feature.

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24288 Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 24316] [Shadow]: implement :ancestor and change :host behavior

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24316 Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 25915] New: Cross-origin requests

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25915 Bug ID: 25915 Summary: Cross-origin requests Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 25914] New: No definition of parsing blob's scheme data

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25914 Bug ID: 25914 Summary: No definition of parsing blob's scheme data Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity:

Re: [Bug 25376] - Web Components won't integrate without much testing

2014-05-29 Thread Axel Dahmen
Yes, Tab, your below summary is correct. First, let me (again) stress the fact that my intention is NOT to give a critical judgment on Web Components. Many ways lead to Rome. Web Components is one way of implementing discrete components into a web page. And the HTML IFRAME element is just

Fetch API

2014-05-29 Thread Anne van Kesteren
The plan is to implement and ship this fairly soon, so I figured I'd ask for review now, while we're still drafting the text: http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#fetch-api In particular I'd like feedback on the design of Request and Response classes, and the fetch() method. --

Re: Fetch API

2014-05-29 Thread Takeshi Yoshino
http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-request Add steps to set client and context? http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#cors-preflight-fetch-0 Add steps to set client and context? http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-legacy-fetch http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-legacy-potentially-cors-enabled-fetch

Re: Fetch API

2014-05-29 Thread Marcos
On May 29, 2014 at 9:02:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren (ann...@annevk.nl) wrote: The plan is to implement and ship this fairly soon, so I figured I'd ask for review now, while we're still drafting the text: http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#fetch-api In particular I'd like feedback on the

Re: Fetch API

2014-05-29 Thread Tobie Langel
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Marcos mar...@marcosc.com wrote: enum RequestMode { same-origin, tainted cross-origin, CORS, CORS-with-forced-preflight }; I think these are badly named (even though they use the names used in HTML and Fetch). It's going to be annoying to type these out for

Re: Data URL Origin (Was: Blob URL Origin)

2014-05-29 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: My proposal is something like this: Thanks! * Add a new flag to the fetch algorithm allow inheriting origin same-origin data URL flag? Ideally we don't do another data URL mistake. * The default for this new flag is

Re: [Bug 25376] - Web Components won't integrate without much testing

2014-05-29 Thread marc fawzi
Excuse my unsolicited comment here, being new to the webapps mailing list, but here is my two cents feedback as a web developer... I think the idea behind Web Components is good regardless of the flaws on the spec. The idea is to create a standard built into the browser that will allow

[Bug 25916] New: [Explainer]: Custom pseudo elements are still used in the examples.

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25916 Bug ID: 25916 Summary: [Explainer]: Custom pseudo elements are still used in the examples. Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All

Re: Fetch API

2014-05-29 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Marcos mar...@marcosc.com wrote: enum RequestMode { same-origin, tainted cross-origin, CORS, CORS-with-forced-preflight }; I think these are badly named (even though they use the

Re: Should minimal contentEditable default text input (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-05-29 Thread Julie Parent
Without default text input, the current proposal for contentEditable=minimal is essentially just enabling cursors (drawing them, dispatching events, performing default actions). Rather than calling the mode minimal, which is ill-defined, why not explicitly call it what it is: cursor-only? Or,

Re: Data URL Origin (Was: Blob URL Origin)

2014-05-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: * The default for this new flag is false * If the flag is set to false, the origin of the URL is a unique identifier. * When the origin is a unique