Re: Should minimal contentEditable default text input (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-05-30 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Julie Parent jpar...@gmail.com wrote: Or, rather than tying this concept to contentEditable, with all the assumptions and complications that brings up, why not expose this building block as a completely separate attribute? Just a DOM API perhaps as you're not

[Bug 25908] Is element editable if it's hidden

2014-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25908 Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 25924] New: [Imports]: The spec. is not very specific about the edge cases of the load

2014-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25924 Bug ID: 25924 Summary: [Imports]: The spec. is not very specific about the edge cases of the load Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: All

Re: [Bug 25376] - Web Components won't integrate without much testing

2014-05-30 Thread Jarrod Overson
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote: Web Components install complex concepts (e.g. decorators) by introducing unique, complex, opaque behaviours, abandoning the pure nature of presentation. Decorators were dropped last i checked, but many of the new

[Bug 25924] [Imports]: The spec. is not very specific about the edge cases of the load

2014-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25924 Gabor Krizsanits gkrizsan...@mozilla.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 25915] Cross-origin requests

2014-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25915 Arun a...@mozilla.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 25914] No definition of parsing blob's scheme data

2014-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25914 Arun a...@mozilla.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

WebApp installation via the browser

2014-05-30 Thread Jeffrey Walton
I have a question about Use Cases for Installable WebApps located at https://w3c-webmob.github.io/installable-webapps/. Under section Add to Homescreen, the document states: ... giving developers the choice to tightly integrate their web applications into the OS directly from the Web

Re: WebApp installation via the browser

2014-05-30 Thread Brendan Eich
Jeffrey Walton wrote: Are there any platforms providing the feature? Has the feature gained any traction among the platform vendors? Firefox OS wants this. /be

Re: WebApp installation via the browser

2014-05-30 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote: Jeffrey Walton wrote: Are there any platforms providing the feature? Has the feature gained any traction among the platform vendors? Firefox OS wants this. Thanks Brendan. As a second related question, is an

Re: WebApp installation via the browser

2014-05-30 Thread Brendan Eich
Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Brendan Eichbren...@mozilla.org wrote: Jeffrey Walton wrote: Are there any platforms providing the feature? Has the feature gained any traction among the platform vendors? Firefox OS wants this. Thanks Brendan. As a second related

Re: WebApp installation via the browser

2014-05-30 Thread marc fawzi
Another question about the subject https://developers.google.com/chrome/apps/docs/developers_guide This says that they can also run in the background, which is huge. I'm not sure if they support content scripts like extensions and packaged apps do. I would love to find out if the spec says