https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25924
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25915
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25914
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
On 31/05/14 08:12, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I have a question about WebApps manifests and permissions. The page is
part of Manifest for Web Applications located at
http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/manifest/.
The editor's draft for Manifest is at: http://w3c.github.io/manifest/
The work item
On Sat, 31 May 2014, at 10:40, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I have a question about Use Cases for Installable WebApps located at
https://w3c-webmob.github.io/installable-webapps/.
Under section Add to Homescreen, the document states:
... giving developers the choice to tightly integrate their
You're probably think of IE's Pinned Sites concept on Windows 8:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg491731.aspx
Sincerely,
James Greene
Sent from my [smart?]phone
On May 31, 2014 10:35 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014, at 10:40, Jeffrey Walton
I agree it's better to let authors define what behavior they want from UA
instead of defining the set of behaviors ourselves.
Furthermore, I'd argue that we should separately have a mode where scripts
would get intention events but UA wouldn't enact any builtin editing commands
as default
Thanks!
- R. Niwa
On May 20, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Ben Peters ben.pet...@microsoft.com wrote:
I have filed a bug to track this issue [1].
Ben
[1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25831
From: Ben Peters [mailto:ben.pet...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014
