On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Brett Zamir bret...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking to make a genuine polyfill for dialog (not just a shim),
and I found Polymer's CustomElements helpful, but realized too late that
the spec required x- prefixes.
I still feel like it would be useful to have a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
Right now, the Blob URL Store is defined in terms of units of similar-origin
browsing contexts; each unit is required to have a Blob URL Store. As you
point out, that allows all origins within document.domain access to
On 04.06.2014 11:00, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Oda, Terri terri@intel.com wrote:
Perhaps it would make sense to also require explicit allowing of imports via
CSP? Scripts are allowed when no CSP is provided for historical
compatibility so you'd need to make
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Frederik Braun fbr...@mozilla.com wrote:
Were you saying script import=url/script or script src=url
import/script?
The former. The latter is reserved for loading and executing scripts.
I, by the way, wholeheartedly agree that link tags become more
dangerous
Thanks, any way to track/be notified when this will be available?
Regards
Aymeric
Le 06/06/2014 19:42, Travis Leithead a écrit :
Well, in IE's defense, this is not specifically allowed by:
http://www.w3.org/TR/workers/#dom-worker. Regardless, the product team is
working to fix this so that
On 6/9/14 12:09 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
I think it might be best to flip the regular bit to off for now,
and only use this time slot when we have other participants. Thus,
consider the weekly call cancelled unless there's an announcement
otherwise.
That sounds like a good plan Dimitri.
Thanks, this is helpful to know, though I'd still prefer a solution at
some point which didn't require one to use extra code and once the
polyfill was no longer needed, requiring alteration of code to be
semantically correct (e.g., if it no longer is a x-polyfill-dialog
because the
Unfortunately, there is not presently a way for you to track it externally. :-(
MS Connect is the best we have so far, and I know that it is not great. We
recognize this is a problem and hope to be able to improve the situation soon.
-Original Message-
From: Aymeric Vitte
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26033
Bug ID: 26033
Summary: Make distribution algorithm forward compatible with
shadow as function call.
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
