Hallvord --
That behavior is really all I wanted, i.e. don't let the browser
discard/ignore valid RTF clipboard data.
I would also echo Paul's thoughts: this sounds good but is there any
OS/browser-level sanitization process necessary? I would be curious to
hear from Ben if Microsoft already
Hi,
Is there a plan to publish an errata to sync the Web Storage Rec [1] with the
latest? I counted 8 commits cherry picked into the Editor's Draft since Rec [2].
If no errata publication is planned, I'd expect the Rec to clearly indicate its
status.
Thanks,
-Anssi
[1]
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28522
Bug ID: 28522
Summary: [Shadow] Cascading for trees of no-inner/outer and
no-younger/older relationship
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
(Aside: I was testing the queryCommandEnabled()/onbefore* idea with this
script: https://gist.github.com/hallvors/59a90f2e3816cb57f044 )
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:29 AM, James M. Greene james.m.gre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Patrick Kettner offered up another idea for this as well on a related
On 2/24/15 3:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at
Google's Mount View CA office is now open:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/
The meeting/agenda page is:
Hi all,
Following WebApps discussion last year [1] and earlier this year [2] about
template transclusions and inheritance in shadow DOM, Jan Miksovsky at
Component Kitchen, Ted O'Connor and I (Ryosuke Niwa) at Apple had a meeting
where we came up with changes to the way shadow DOM distributes
I just checked the html living standard, all it says about prefetch is
The prefetch keyword indicates that preemptively fetching and caching the
specified resource is likely to be beneficial
This is pretty vague, and I sense the caching mechanism used by one vendor is
not guaranteed to be
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Daniel Freedman dfre...@google.com wrote:
Hi Ryosuke,
I want to start by thanking you, Ted, and Jan for taking the time to make
this proposal.
I read through the proposal, and had a quick question about how
redistribution should work with this slot concept.
On Apr 21, 2015 8:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
Hi all,
Following WebApps discussion last year [1] and earlier this year [2]
about template transclusions and inheritance in shadow DOM, Jan Miksovsky
at Component Kitchen, Ted O'Connor and I (Ryosuke Niwa) at Apple had
a meeting
On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:17 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 21, 2015 8:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com
mailto:rn...@apple.com wrote:
Hi all,
Following WebApps discussion last year [1] and earlier this year [2] about
template transclusions and inheritance in
On Apr 21, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Daniel Freedman dfre...@google.com wrote:
Hi Ryosuke,
I want to start by thanking you, Ted, and Jan for taking the time to make
this proposal.
I read through the proposal, and had a quick question about how
redistribution should work with this slot
On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:23 PM, Justin Fagnani justinfagn...@google.com wrote:
I do want the ability to redirect distributed nodes into a holes in the base
template, so that part is welcome to me. However, my first reaction to the
slot idea is that forcing users to add the content-slot
Hi Ryosuke,
I want to start by thanking you, Ted, and Jan for taking the time to make
this proposal.
I read through the proposal, and had a quick question about how
redistribution should work with this slot concept.
I created a quick date-range-combo-box example that would take two date
inputs
I do want the ability to redirect distributed nodes into a holes in the
base template, so that part is welcome to me. However, my first reaction to
the slot idea is that forcing users to add the content-slot attribute on
children significantly impairs the DOM API surface area of custom elements.
If we did that, authors could not use synthetic clipboard events for
anything - right? I'm assuming that authors are going to find use cases for
it - for example a cloud clipboard implementation may want to fire actual
paste events so that data from the cloud is processed like data from the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
hst...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Because redirects are atomic, we cannot dispatch loadend events and
such on the XMLHttpRequestUpload class.
Does this change
16 matches
Mail list logo
