RE: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
> From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiai...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 21:16 > To: Arthur Barstow > Cc: public-webapps > Subject: Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 > > > On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > > > 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per > process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. > > This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. Yes, the spec looks good to me. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May > 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and > explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are > raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this > proposal. > > +1. Thanks for the swift turnaround. I also regenerated an implementation report at http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webstorage/all.html ... for your reference. BTW: I have sent out the above info yesterday, but seems the mailing list system didn't get it. Thanks, Zhiqiang
Re: Directory Upload Proposal
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > One important question though is what would directories> do on platforms that don't have a directory UI concept? > Like most mobile platforms? Err.. that should say: What would do on platforms that don't have a directory UI concept? / Jonas
Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
> On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per > process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 > at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and > explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are > raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this > proposal. +1. Thanks for the swift turnaround. Thanks, -Anssi
CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft WD is [2] and the review period will be three weeks. The draft includes a summary of the changes since the REC was published [3]. 2. Update the REC errata doc [4] to include a reference to the new WD and its changes since REC section, and the github commit history. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this proposal. -Thanks, ArtB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0607.html [2] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/ [3] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/#status-of-this-document> [4] http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/publish/errata-v1.html
