Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

2015-09-29 Thread John Daggett
Late Tuesday afternoon would be a good fit for me. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > Hi, > > Attending the recent meeting for shadow DOM styling [1] convinced me to > join CSS WG, and further that we need a joint meeting between CSS WG and > WebApps WG on

Re: [XHR] Error type when setting request headers.

2015-09-29 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Yves, On 09/29/2015 03:25 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > Hi, In XHR [1], setRequestHeader is defined by this: [[ void > setRequestHeader(ByteString name, ByteString value); ]] It has a > note: [[ Throws a SyntaxError exception if name is not a header >

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

2015-09-29 Thread Alan Stearns
On 9/28/15, 4:49 PM, "rn...@apple.com on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa" wrote: >Hi, > >Attending the recent meeting for shadow DOM styling [1] convinced me to join >CSS WG, and further that we need a joint meeting between CSS WG and WebApps WG >on this topic during TPAC to iron out

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

2015-09-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/29/15 11:19 AM, Alan Stearns wrote: On 9/28/15, 4:49 PM, "rn...@apple.com on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa" wrote: Hi, Attending the recent meeting for shadow DOM styling [1] convinced me to join CSS WG, and further that we need a joint meeting between CSS WG and WebApps WG

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

2015-09-29 Thread Chaals McCathie Nevile
I added a note (as a question) to the meeting wiki page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/October2015Meeting cheers On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:12:16 +0500, John Daggett wrote: Late Tuesday afternoon would be a good fit for me. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ryosuke

Re: Indexed DB + Promises

2015-09-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > This seems ... reasonable, and quite possibly the best we can do. It has a > several notable rough edges: > > - The need to remember to use .promise, instead of just having functions > whose return values you can await

RE: Indexed DB + Promises

2015-09-29 Thread Domenic Denicola
This seems ... reasonable, and quite possibly the best we can do. It has a several notable rough edges: - The need to remember to use .promise, instead of just having functions whose return values you can await directly - The two-stage error paths (exceptions + rejections), necessitating