Fwd: Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors

2015-12-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Editors, All - please see "Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors" and reflect it in your spec, accordingly. Forwarded Message Subject:Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification

Re: Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors

2015-12-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Editors, All - please see "Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification > Authors" > and reflect it in your spec, accordingly. Tracking can be a

Re: WS/Service Workers, TLS and future apps - [was Re: HTTP is just fine]

2015-12-01 Thread Brad Hill
> As far as I see it, a "mixed content" has the word "content", which is supposed to designate something that can be included in a web page and therefore be dangerous. "Mixed Content" (and "mixed content blocking") is a term of art that has been in use for many years in the browser community. As

Re: WS/Service Workers, TLS and future apps - [was Re: HTTP is just fine]

2015-12-01 Thread Aymeric Vitte
Le 01/12/2015 05:31, Brad Hill a écrit : > Let's keep this discussion civil, please. Maybe some wording was a little tough below, apologies for this, the logjam attack is difficult to swallow, how something that is supposed to protect forward secrecy can do quietly the very contrary without

RE: Meeting date, january

2015-12-01 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Chaals McCathie Nevile [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] > Yes, likewise for me. Anne, Olli specifically called you out as someone we > should ask. I am assuming most people are OK either way, having heard no > loud screaming except for Elliot... I would be pretty heartbroken if we met