[Bug 23780] Check XMLHttpRequest and Notification don' t break given the new script settings object stuff

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23780 Bug 23780 depends on bug 18242, which changed state. Bug 18242 Summary: Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly in the case of e.g. a.setTimeout(b.postMessage, 0) // called from c

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

+1 On 2 June 2016 at 13:48, Léonie Watson wrote: > Hello WP, > > This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML > Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). It has been posted > to > public-webapps@w3.org as the official email for this WG. >

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

> On Jun 3, 2016, at 01:35, Chaals McCathie Nevile > wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:14:38 +0200, wrote: > >> Can we please kindly stop the +1s spam? It greatly diminishes the value of >> this mailing list. >> >> For the purpose of progressing a

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

+1 for moving HTML5.1 to CR. Alex On 3 June 2016 at 05:30, Gez Lemon wrote: > +1 > > On 2 June 2016 at 13:48, Léonie Watson wrote: > >> Hello WP, >> >> This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML >> Working Draft (WD) as a

CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

Hello WP, This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). It has been posted to public-webapps@w3.org as the official email for this WG. Please reply to this thread on public-webapps@w3.org no later than end of day

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:48:10 +0200, Léonie Watson wrote: Hello WP, This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). +1 Please do. chaals - Yandex hat on, chair hat off -- Charles McCathie Nevile

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

+1 JF On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL wrote: > +1 to publish WD > > ​ > > > > * katie * > > Katie Haritos-Shea > Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) > > Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryla...@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn

RE: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

> From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk] > Sent: 02 June 2016 13:48 > This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML > Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). It has been > posted to public-webapps@w3.org as the official email for this WG. +1 (as TPG

RE: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

+1 to publish WD ​ * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryla...@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 -Original Message- From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk]

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

Hi Marcos, While it may feel spammy to you, this is a long-standing part of the W3C Consensus process, and generally speaking all CfCs include the following: "Positive responses are preferred and encouraged, silence will be considered as assent." On the surface, and in principle, I disagree

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:14:38 +0200, wrote: Can we please kindly stop the +1s spam? It greatly diminishes the value of this mailing list. For the purpose of progressing a spec, the only thing that matters is objections. Hi Marcos, If there are no objections, then the

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

> On 3 Jun 2016, at 2:28 AM, John Foliot wrote: > > Hi Marcos, > > While it may feel spammy to you, this is a long-standing part of the W3C > Consensus process, and generally speaking all CfCs include the following: > > "Positive responses are preferred and

RE: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

> From: mar...@marcosc.com [mailto:mar...@marcosc.com] > Sent: 02 June 2016 17:15 > Can we please kindly stop the +1s spam? It greatly diminishes the value of > this mailing list. We mention in the CFC that positive responses are preferred and encouraged (which they are), so this is an appeal to

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

aye - (as TPG WG person) -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C On 2 June 2016 at 13:48, Léonie Watson wrote: > Hello WP, > > This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current

RE: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

+1 Mona Rekhi SSB BART Group -Original Message- From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:48 AM To: 'public-webapps WG' Subject: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR) Hello WP, This is a call for

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

Can we please kindly stop the +1s spam? It greatly diminishes the value of this mailing list. For the purpose of progressing a spec, the only thing that matters is objections. > On 3 Jun 2016, at 12:36 AM, Mona Rekhi wrote: > > +1 > > Mona Rekhi > SSB BART

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

+1 for moving HTML5.1 to CR