On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Zhenbin Xu wrote:
Ian wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Sunava Dutta wrote:
When Parsing Error happens, IE would still retain responseXML and
put error information on the object. Isnt this better than null as
there�s more relevant information for the web developer?
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:24:12 +0200, Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I want to note that during this same timeframe, we have been
holding regular telcons for DOM3 Events, and that Travis Leithead (also
of Microsoft's IE team) has been very helpful and productive, and has
On Jun 16, 2008, at 1:50 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Maciej-
You may have misunderstood what I wrote. I did not propose that
issues be brought up and solved in a binding manner during a single
telcon (though some minor issues may be, in the interest of acting
in a suitably-paced
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:38:44 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The downsides of inventing a URI scheme include:
1) URIs using this scheme will not parse into components properly (the
feed: scheme has this problem)
2) The scheme really should be registered through IANA,
It would be great if microsoft could do this.
Sunava Dutta wrote:
I LOVE the idea!
-Original Message-
From: Doug Schepers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 12:39 PM
To: Chris Wilson
Cc: Ian Hickson; Sunava Dutta; Arthur Barstow; Marc Silbey; public-
webapps; Eric
Sumary: PLease register - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2008/
We have two rooms reserved, so that we can work on stuff in parallel.
The full schedule is at http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Schedule and they
ask you to stay at the hotel at 195€/night (single - double room is
Hi Sunava et Al,
Thanks for the feedback!
This is a great start for a discussion. I hope we can get to more
concrete discussions about the various issues that microsoft is seeing
and try to figure out ways to address them.
There is a lot of experience at microsoft on these issues,
