Re: Widget Icon behaviour...
Hi Jochen, On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Jochen Cichon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, short question on the icons, inside the config.xml. (I know, that part is not yet written) It is possible to store more than one icon, but which icon is used? My thought was to have several icons in different sizes, or even an SVG icon (which is not a must for the widget UserAgent). Currently I'm unsure which icon is used, because the widget UA does understand gif, png and jpeg (maybe others). Given the following example (e.g. small is 32x32, large is 64x64, huge is 128x128pixel. And svg is ... scaleable ;) widget .. icon src=icon.svg/ icon src=small_icon.png/ icon src=small_icon.gif/ icon src=large_icon.jpg/ icon src=huge_icon.jpg/ /widget So for my point of view, the UA will need to find the size of an icon by reading the header or even the full image, or in the case of an svg say that it will scale to any resolution. This is correct. But then the question which icon will have precedence? Depends on the rendering context and media type. Please see: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#icons http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#displaying We are working on this text at the moment, so if it's still a bit vague let us know and we will try to clarify it. Also from my point of view, the first icon will be used. So in the example above the PNG may look better than the GIF. (example) Again, please see the links above. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Re: Widget Icon behaviour...
Oh, thanks for that quick response. I looked up the two references, and found that svg will/should be prioritized before all others. And that the UA needs to find out the correct size. But as stated in the last line it is not clear which one the agent will choose if both have the same size. Which basically means is icon src=small_icon.png/ icon src=small_icon.gif/ the same as icon src=small_icon.gif/ icon src=small_icon.png/ and the UA will choose PNG before GIF or is the xml order forcing th eUA to choose png. (which is my thought...) Thanks, bye. -- Jochen Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Jochen, On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Jochen Cichon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, short question on the icons, inside the config.xml. (I know, that part is not yet written) It is possible to store more than one icon, but which icon is used? My thought was to have several icons in different sizes, or even an SVG icon (which is not a must for the widget UserAgent). Currently I'm unsure which icon is used, because the widget UA does understand gif, png and jpeg (maybe others). Given the following example (e.g. small is 32x32, large is 64x64, huge is 128x128pixel. And svg is ... scaleable ;) widget .. icon src=icon.svg/ icon src=small_icon.png/ icon src=small_icon.gif/ icon src=large_icon.jpg/ icon src=huge_icon.jpg/ /widget So for my point of view, the UA will need to find the size of an icon by reading the header or even the full image, or in the case of an svg say that it will scale to any resolution. This is correct. But then the question which icon will have precedence? Depends on the rendering context and media type. Please see: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#icons http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#displaying We are working on this text at the moment, so if it's still a bit vague let us know and we will try to clarify it. Also from my point of view, the first icon will be used. So in the example above the PNG may look better than the GIF. (example) Again, please see the links above.
Fwd: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
Hey Chaals, What makes you think that your pious and arrogant attitude makes you a moderator? You have no right to dictate what I can say. And this: Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is *not* Private mail. Only you would know why you mailed multiple people and called it private. I'm putting this on the list so we can see what kind of person Chaals is. It looks like you took it upon yourself to go out of your way to describe me as inappropriate, accusatory, counter-productive and attacking. You then asked me to stick to demonstrable facts. We don't really know why you did this. I pointed out the OP's mistakes, asked him some questions, and followed with my opinion of the relevance of YUI Test (Re Hallvord's Comments). Nobody should discourage code reviews. Especially not for code that is supposed to be taken seriously. Garrett -- Forwarded message -- From: Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:33 AM Subject: Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format To: Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Private mail: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:56:35 +0200, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Carmelo Montanez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks: I am getting ready to submit a number of tests and wanted to get your feedback on format. We already agreed on a template a few weeks back. This follows on that format. Just wanted to get your view before I go forward. See attached files. You obviously did not try running this in any browser. Hi Garrett, please refrain from making assumptions about what people do. Opening a mail with an accusatory or attacking tone of this nature is counter-productive, and therefore inappropriate for this working group. Please keep your comments to demonstrable facts and a more positive tone in future. thanks Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://www.opera.com
