On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Marcos Caceres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Mark Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Marcos Caceres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, In one of my previous emails I said that this was a potential
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Mark Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
file:, despite the name, doesn't have to be mapped to the file system.
Its scope could be limited in exactly the same way you've limited
widget: there. Similarly, ftp or http - even part of the space -
*could* be mapped to
