Re: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Ian, Can you please respond to my request how to implement other flavour names? Also, I would like to see test-cases and reports for the implementations you indicate here. paul Le 22-oct.-08 à 17:02, Ian Hickson a écrit : On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: Ian, how

Re: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)

2008-10-23 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Paul Libbrecht wrote: Can you please respond to my request how to implement other flavour names? The getData() and setData() functions take arbitrary MIME types; does that cover it? Also, I would like to see test-cases and reports for the implementations you

RE: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)

2008-10-23 Thread Chris Wilson
Paul Libbrecht wrote: Yesterday, discussion with Chris Wilson and Adrian Bateman, of MSIE team, revealed that allowing arbitrary flavours would be a big security hole for Windows at least (I believe this is Windows only but can't confirm yet). I wouldn't call it a security hole as much as I

Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec

2008-10-23 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: All, Maceij wrote: [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapps/2008OctDec/0010.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0047.html [3]

Re: ISSUE-77 (XHR2+loadend): XMLHttpRequestEventTarget should have attribute EventListener onloadend [XHR2]

2008-10-23 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:13:33 +0200, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISSUE-77 (XHR2+loadend): XMLHttpRequestEventTarget should have attribute EventListener onloadend [XHR2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/77 Raised by: Olli Pettay On

Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec

2008-10-23 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:59:58 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you be against making it a v1 spec in and of itself? This e-mail thread is quite confusing. From what I gathered during the Web Apps F2F this week people were not ok with not having some kind blob API.

Re: ISSUE-77 (XHR2+loadend): XMLHttpRequestEventTarget should have attribute EventListener onloadend [XHR2]

2008-10-23 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:21:37 +0200, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:13:33 +0200, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XHR2/upload should probably have onloadend attribute. The spec should also mention when to dispatch

[widgets] Widget locale

2008-10-23 Thread Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
The definition of 'widget locale' is currently not in sync in the 'Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration' [1] and 'Widget 1.0: APIs and Events' [2] specs. The locale issue has been mentioned earlier by Addison Phillips (comment #16 in [3]) and fixed, but I just noticed that the APIs spec

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

2008-10-23 Thread Jonas Sicking
Garrett Smith wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24 Hopefully this draft is ready for last

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

2008-10-23 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do remember that we talked about it that way, and also talked about having the default action of the loadend event be to fire the appropriate abort/error/load event. However I'm not sure why that way is better?

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

2008-10-23 Thread Garrett Smith
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems very

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

2008-10-23 Thread Garrett Smith
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Garrett Smith wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: