Hi Mark,
Please see [1] for TAG discussion about WebApps proposal of widget URI
scheme. From what I got from the discussion, the TAG seems to agree
that we likely do need our own URI scheme. We just need to flesh out
our technical argument a little more. We are also going to try to
coordinate
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Marcos Caceres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
Please see [1] for TAG discussion about WebApps proposal of widget URI
scheme. From what I got from the discussion, the TAG seems to agree
that we likely do need our own URI scheme.
Hmm, have you read the
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I agree. Not sure if that is what you want to do before or after getting the
load/error/abort event though?
I should mention that I'm not particularly married to having things one way
or another.
