Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted

2009-01-15 Thread Scott Wilson
All, Two EU-funded projects have implemented the draft W3C Widgets specifications, both the packaging and API parts. What is notable from these projects have been the adaptations used to enable widgets conforming to the draft to be used in a web environment rather than in a dedicated

Re: [widgets] Minutes from 8 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-15 Thread timeless
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: JS: there is a protocol for helping sort out a chain if something is missing ... Gecko has some new suport for this it's indeed AIA - Authority Information Access

Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8

2009-01-15 Thread Bil Corry
Maciej Stachowiak wrote on 1/15/2009 12:47 AM: So one thing to keep in mind is that any POST-based form would not be vulnerable to this kind of attack unless the victim site actually submits a form to an untrusted site. There is no way for a GET request to be redirected to a POST, and it

Re: Fwd: SVG 1.1 Java interface license

2009-01-15 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Rigo. Rigo Wenning: it is not clear to me what you are exactly asking for. The Apache XML commons files now contain the right text in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/commons/trunk/java/external/ Yes, Michael Glavassevich updated the text there just recently, but I pointed out to him

Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8

2009-01-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Jan 15, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Bil Corry wrote: Maciej Stachowiak wrote on 1/15/2009 12:47 AM: So one thing to keep in mind is that any POST-based form would not be vulnerable to this kind of attack unless the victim site actually submits a form to an untrusted site. There is no way for a GET

Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8

2009-01-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
Hixie said the position I expressed was a little unclear, so I'd like to clarify briefly: 1) FACT: The HTML5 version of the CSRF-defense header (currently called 'XXX-Origin' as a temporary measure) is specified not to be sent for GET requests. 1.a) FACT: As a result, it does not