RE: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments

Hey Julian! Thanks for your mail. I'm adding my x-teammates from IE who should be able to help you here. FYI I've transitioned over to our Online Services Group here at MS! All the best! -Original Message- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de] Sent: Monday, February 09, 200

Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

There are a few active JS implementation projects: xbl.googlecode.com, see http://code.google.com/p/xbl/wiki/Features dojo.E has some support, see: http://blog.nexaweb.com/post/xbl-support-for-all-browsers-via-dojoe/ XBLUI, see: http://meekostuff.net/projects/XBLUI/status.html XBLUI (my pro

Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi All, The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago. Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported (e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently. Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us? I don't yet have a

Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute

On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > To complement [ImplementedOn] I think we need [Implements]. For > instance, objects implementing the XMLHttpRequest interface must > implement the EventTarget interface can be neatly described in the IDL: > > [Constructor, >Implements=Even

Seeking implementation status of XBL2

Hi All, The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago. Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported (e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently. Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us? -Regards, Art Barstow [1]

[webidl] [Implements] extended attribute

To complement [ImplementedOn] I think we need [Implements]. For instance, objects implementing the XMLHttpRequest interface must implement the EventTarget interface can be neatly described in the IDL: [Constructor, Implements=EventTarget] interface XMLHttpRequest ... It would be nic

Re: [cors] Updates

On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:25:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 9 Feb 2009, at 13:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote: * There was a logic error in the cache processing model. I wonder whether that part of the spec is actually being implemented (or found useful by implementors). If not, I'm al

Re: [cors] Updates

On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:25:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 9 Feb 2009, at 13:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote: * There was a logic error in the cache processing model. I wonder whether that part of the spec is actually being implemented (or found useful by implementors). If not, I'm all f

Re: [cors] Updates

On 9 Feb 2009, at 13:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote: * There was a logic error in the cache processing model. I wonder whether that part of the spec is actually being implemented (or found useful by implementors). If not, I'm all for dropping it. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C

[cors] Updates

After renaming the specification I decided to go through the normative parts of the specification again to clean various things up and resolve some outstanding issues. Since the October 6 editor's draft (last relatively stable draft) the following things have changed starting January 14:

[cors] Status

Last week I have been cleaning up CORS with respect to the normative definitions and various algorithms. I will summarize those changes in a separate e-mail. I'm now trying to figure out how to deal with the remaining bits of work. I would very much appreciate it if people involved in COR

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

timeless wrote: This specification introduces two methods that take a group of selectors it requires a script like the following that iterates that => which ? No, "that" is correct in this case. With these methods, it is easier to match a set of Element nodes based on specific criteria.

If not Multiple-Contents, how do we have Widgets with multiple modes?

Hello. I'm following the specs evolving for Window Modes (http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#window-modes). Given the fact that the "content tag" has an occurrence of "0 or 1", and the fact that the "mode" is one, my question is: - Would it be possible to have widgets that have "multiple views"

XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments

Following up to a mail from May 2008: Julian Reschke wrote: Sunava Dutta wrote: ... At this point, I'm not sure why we're bothering with XHR1 at all. It is *not* what the current implementations do anyway. [Sunava Dutta] I'm sorry, this statement is concerning and I'd like to understand it b

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ I've been meaning to read this for months. sorry for the delay, i expect none of my comments are significant, but i enjoy reading and writing > This specification introduces two