I wish to comment on the recommendation that NodeLists returned by
the selectors API will be static.
I feel this removes one of the great benefits of live collections,
that is, that once a collection is created, it is automatically
updated by the browser itself. This provides the
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:32:56 +0100, Robert Green rg...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
I have been told that the reason for not having live collections is for
performance, but I find that hard to understand. The current live
collections are much faster than their native javascript emulations, I
can't
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:49:17 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Just as a point of record, I believe browser implementors were split on
the issue (e.g. I think in Gecko live performance would be as good, if
not better in many cases, as non-live performance. I said so at the
time
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:49:17 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Just as a point of record, I believe browser implementors were split
on the issue (e.g. I think in Gecko live performance would be as good,
if not better in many cases, as non-live performance.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:00:49 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Interesting. I recall only hearing back from WebKit and Opera at the
time I made the initial decision.
I recall that feedback as well, but assumed that this was the usual
issue of some
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2007Mar/0066.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2007Apr/0009.html
I read those. That was long after this was initially discussed though.
And also around the time I stopped being the active editor of
Hi Josh,
Many thanks for your input, again I'll ensure your comments are
considered.
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: timeless.b...@gmail.com [mailto:timeless.b...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of timeless
Sent: 23 March 2009 14:17
To: David Rogers
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: FW:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:30:54 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2007Mar/0066.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2007Apr/0009.html
I read those. That was long after this was initially
Hello.
Does anyone agrees that probably we missed an API?
Something like widget.changeMode(String newMode);?
This should allow the widget to ask the WUA to change it's mode: of course
the WUA can refuse to do so, but I think the API should be available.
Any idea/feedback about this?
Regards
IE8 implements the localStorage feature of the Web Storage specification:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#storage
However, in a recent thread on the whatwg mailing list [1], it was noticed
that IE8 fails to implement the following requirement from the section
entitled 3.6 Threads:
#
10 matches
Mail list logo
