[widgets] Draft Minutes from 9 June 2009 f2f meeting

2009-06-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
The draft minutes from the June 9 Widgets f2f are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/09-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 18 June 2009 (the next Widgets

[widgets] Draft Minutes from 10 June 2009 f2f meeting

2009-06-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
The draft minutes from the June 10 Widgets f2f are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 18 June 2009 (the next Widgets

Reminder: June 19 deadline for comments re LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec

2009-06-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
This is a reminder that June 19 is the deadline for comments for the LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) art.bars...@nokia.com Date: May 28, 2009 1:58:47 PM EDT To: public-webapps

Comments on Widgets spec

2009-06-12 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Hi, 5.3 Zip Relative Paths has the following bugs: * the ABNF for zip-rel-path uses localized-folder, but only locale-folder is defined * the third rule for the conformance checker should be: A CC must inform the author of any Zip relative paths whose length exceed 120 characters (rather than

Re: send data using the Web Socket and UCS-2

2009-06-12 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Jeff Walden wrote: The specification should say what happens when WebSocket.postMessage(data) is called where data is not structurally correct UTF-16 -- lone surrogates, backwards surrogates, and any similar structural errors I might have forgotten. The IETF protocol

Re: XHR without user credentials

2009-06-12 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: I sort of like the idea of having a new (named) constructor or maybe have the constructor take an argument to indicate credentials are supposed to be omitted. This would also allow us to drop the withCredentials flag.

Re: XHR without user credentials

2009-06-12 Thread Adam Barth
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Mark S. Millererig...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote: What server side behavior difference do you expect between messages with no Origin and messages with Origin: null. You'll have to include Origin: