Re: [cors] Web application

2009-06-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:54:36 +0200, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com wrote: Anne van Kesteren wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application No, they actually don't. The article is mainly about server-side web applications with a few mentions about client-side webapps, not only about

Re: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, versioning

2009-06-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Marcin, For the sake of the disposition of comments, can you please acknowledge that you are satisfied with the responses of the working group in this email thread. A response from you is required for us to progress the document to CR. If we don't receive a response by the 21st of June, we

Re: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, interoperability

2009-06-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Marcin, (Sorry, process dictates that I have to keep sending these for each of your emails:( ) For the sake of the disposition of comments, can you please acknowledge that you are satisfied with the responses of the working group in this email thread. A response from you is required for us to

New WD of Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0

2009-06-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On June 4 the Web Annotations WG published a new WD of Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0: [[ http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-annot-reqs-20090604/ Abstract This document specifies use cases and requirements as an input for the development of the

Re: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, 3

2009-06-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Marcin, (Sorry, process dictates that I have to keep sending these for each of your emails:( ) For the sake of the disposition of comments, can you please acknowledge that you are satisfied with the responses of the working group in this email thread. A response from you is required for us to

RE: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, interoperability

2009-06-16 Thread Marcin Hanclik
Hi Marcos, I can live with the current version and scope of the spec with regards to interoperability. (Sorry, process dictates that I have to keep sending these for each of your emails:( ) Could we agree that I will send my confirmations to all my PC LC emails we exchanged and with which I am

RE: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, interoperability

2009-06-16 Thread Marcin Hanclik
OK, agreed. Thanks. Marcin Hanclik ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465 Mobile: +49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com -Original Message- From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos

Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for feature

2009-06-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Henri, On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Arve Bersvendsenar...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:57:46 +0200, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote: Please state the purpose of feature. (That it's for authorizing features that don't participate in the Web-oriented browser security

Re: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency

2009-06-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Marcin Hanclikmarcin.hanc...@access-company.com wrote: Hi Art, As for View Modes spec, I provided ACCESS' input several months ago, from NetFront Widgets implementation. The problem I have now is that PC is almost ready and it normatively references another

[widgets] Specifying the view modes

2009-06-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
Begin forwarded message: From: ext Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com Date: June 16, 2009 8:58:14 AM EDT To: Marcin Hanclik marcin.hanc...@access-company.com Cc: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) art.bars...@nokia.com, Bryan Sullivan bs3...@att.com, public-webapps public- weba...@w3.org Subject:

Re: [widgets] PC LC, general comments

2009-06-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:26 PM, jere.kapy...@nokia.com wrote: On 3.6.2009 18.29, ext Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:50 PM,  jere.kapy...@nokia.com wrote: A user agent MAY support the [Widgets-DigSig] specification ... And would have written it as: A user

ISSUE-90: Exposing more (~infinite) response headers [CORS]

2009-06-16 Thread Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-90: Exposing more (~infinite) response headers [CORS] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/90 Raised by: Anne van Kesteren On product: CORS In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0967.html Mark Nottingham comments on the asymmetry of exposing the body

Re: [cors] Review

2009-06-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:22:03 +0200, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote: IMO this is a showstopper for CORS1. Do the right thing: expand the list of headers allowed and add this functionality now. Ok, I raised this issue on the subject http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/90 so we

ISSUE-91: Origin and redirects [CORS]

2009-06-16 Thread Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-91: Origin and redirects [CORS] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/91 Raised by: Anne van Kesteren On product: CORS In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1000.html Anne van Kesteren raises the issue whether the Origin header should expose

Re: [cors] origin and redirects

2009-06-16 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: This creates some related issues we have to sort out one way or another: A) How does this affect Access-Control-Allow-Origin? B) How does this affect the preflight result cache? I am very glad that the current

Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme?

2009-06-16 Thread Aaron Boodman
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Robin Berjonro...@berjon.com wrote: Just out of curiosity, would you mind expanding on the design ideas that you share with widgets that make you so happy? We're interested in happiness :) Also, do you think that beyond design ideas you could at some point reuse

RE: [cors] Web application

2009-06-16 Thread Mike Wilson
Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:54:36 +0200, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com wrote: Anne van Kesteren wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application No, they actually don't. The article is mainly about server-side web applications with a few mentions about

Re: [cors] Web application

2009-06-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:39:09 +0200, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com wrote: Seriously Anne, I don't know what game you are playing, but I'm ending this discussion right here. I wish you would accept input from people more experienced in some fields than yourself, without resorting to putting

Re: XBL2 Status?

2009-06-16 Thread Jonas Sicking
Hi Art, Planning is in full speed for our XBL2 implementation. Development will start shortly. First design docs are available here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/XBL2 (not sure if the docs will be very understandable for non-gecko-developers. The target audience is XBL2 gecko implementors) / Jonas

Re: XHR without user credentials

2009-06-16 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:15:18 +0200, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Could you provide a code example that shows how to send an XHR request to the same Origin without credentials using the HTML5 iframe

Re: [cors] Review

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Nottingham
Thanks for the new issue. On 17/06/2009, at 12:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Indeed. Were other approaches to applying policy to multiple URLs considered? I and others have certainly tried to think of ways to make this work, but so far we have not found anything satisfactory. If you

Agenda:DOM3 Events Telcon

2009-06-16 Thread Doug Schepers
Hi, DOM3 Events Folks- We will be holding the next DOM3 Events telcon tomorrow, Wednesday, 17 June 2009, at 21:00 UTC. [1] Please consult adjust for your local time. We meet on both phone and IRC. Number: Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99 or +44.117.370.6152

Re: [cors] Review

2009-06-16 Thread Tyler Close
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Mark Nottinghamm...@mnot.net wrote: On 17/06/2009, at 12:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Indeed. Were other approaches to applying policy to multiple URLs considered? I and others have certainly tried to think of ways to make this work, but so far we have